Capon Adam, Rolfe Margaret, Gillespie James, Smith Wayne
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales; Environmental Health Branch, Health Protection New South Wales.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Feb;39(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12349.
Introducing new technologies into society raises considerable public concern. We determine the public concern about nanoparticles, and compare this concern to other environmental health issues such as wind farms and coal seam gas production.
A repeat cross sectional survey examining views on environmental health issues, risk, chemicals and trust was undertaken in more than 1,300 Australian residents in 2000 and 2013. Logistic regression and principal component analysis was used to investigate predictors of nanoparticle concern and identify a component structure for environmental health issues that could explain a trend of future nanoparticle concern.
Australians have a relatively low level of concern about the risks of nanoparticles to health when compared to their concerns about other environmental health issues. Items associated with concern included gender, a general wish to avoid chemicals and possibly trust in politicians. Concern over nanoparticles clustered with similar views on technological risks.
Current public concern over the risks of nanoparticles is low. However, a reframing of the issue towards 'chemicals' is likely to have a negative effect on risk perceptions. This paper raises questions about appropriate channels for the effective communication of risk.
将新技术引入社会引发了公众的广泛关注。我们确定公众对纳米颗粒的关注,并将这种关注与其他环境健康问题(如风力发电场和煤层气生产)进行比较。
2000年和2013年对1300多名澳大利亚居民进行了一项重复横断面调查,以考察他们对环境健康问题、风险、化学品和信任的看法。采用逻辑回归和主成分分析来研究纳米颗粒关注的预测因素,并确定环境健康问题的一个成分结构,以解释未来纳米颗粒关注的趋势。
与对其他环境健康问题的关注相比,澳大利亚人对纳米颗粒对健康风险的关注程度相对较低。与关注相关的因素包括性别、避免接触化学品的普遍愿望以及对政治家的信任。对纳米颗粒的关注与对技术风险的类似看法聚集在一起。
目前公众对纳米颗粒风险的关注度较低。然而,将问题重新表述为“化学品”可能会对风险认知产生负面影响。本文提出了关于有效风险沟通的适当渠道的问题。