Ulin Kerstin, Olsson Lars-Eric, Wolf Axel, Ekman Inger
Institute of Health and Care Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Centre for Person-Centred Care, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Institute of Health and Care Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Centre for Person-Centred Care, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(3):e19-26. doi: 10.1177/1474515115569945. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Discharge planning is important to bridge the gap between hospital and home. Many patients with chronic heart failure are often fragile elderly with co-morbidities and functional decline due to increased symptom burden. A structured Gothenburg person-centred care (gPCC) approach may promote better discharge-planning.
To evaluate whether proactive care-planning based on the gPCC model leads to improved efficiency in discharge procedures compared with usual care in patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure.
In a controlled before-and-after design, patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure were assigned to either a usual care group or a gPCC intervention group. The patients' social situation, their discharge destination and the number of days until the discharge were recorded. The time interval (in days) between notification and start of coordination of care was recorded.
In total, 248 patients were included, 123 in the usual care group and 125 in the gPCC intervention. During hospitalization, notifications to the community home help service and/or round-the-clock home nursing care services were more frequent in the gPCC-group (33.8%) compared with patients in the usual care group (12.1%). A confirmed discharge planning conference started within the first five days in the gPCC group whereas the usual care group ranged from one to 28 days. Compared with the usual care group, the gPCC group had fewer days in hospital (11 versus 35) ready for discharge.
gPCC improves discharge processes because patients are viewed as competent to be involved in planning their subsequent care.
出院计划对于弥合医院与家庭之间的差距至关重要。许多慢性心力衰竭患者往往是体弱的老年人,伴有合并症,且由于症状负担加重导致功能下降。结构化的哥德堡以人为本的护理(gPCC)方法可能会促进更好的出院计划。
评估与因慢性心力衰竭恶化而住院的患者的常规护理相比,基于gPCC模型的主动护理计划是否能提高出院程序的效率。
在一项前后对照设计中,因慢性心力衰竭恶化而住院的患者被分配到常规护理组或gPCC干预组。记录患者的社会状况、出院目的地以及出院前的天数。记录从通知到开始协调护理之间的时间间隔(以天为单位)。
总共纳入了248名患者,常规护理组123名,gPCC干预组125名。在住院期间,与常规护理组患者(12.1%)相比,gPCC组向社区家庭帮助服务和/或全天候家庭护理服务的通知更为频繁(33.8%)。gPCC组在头五天内就开始了确定的出院计划会议,而常规护理组则为1至28天。与常规护理组相比,gPCC组准备出院的住院天数更少(11天对35天)。
gPCC改善了出院流程,因为患者被视为有能力参与规划其后续护理。