Suppr超能文献

一项关于以患者为中心的干预措施对严重躯体疾病的影响(从结果和成本方面考量)的系统评价。

A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.

机构信息

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK

Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e054386. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054386.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Person-centred care (PCC) is being internationally recognised as a critical attribute of high-quality healthcare. The International Alliance of Patients Organisations defines PCC as care that is focused and organised around people, rather than disease. Focusing on delivery, we aimed to review and evaluate the evidence from interventions that aimed to deliver PCC for people with serious physical illness and identify models of PCC interventions.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, using the following key concepts: patient/person-centred care, family centred care, family based care, individualised care, holistic care, serious illness, chronic illness, long-term conditions from inception to April 2022. Due to heterogeneity of interventions and populations studied, narrative synthesis was conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs checklist.

RESULTS

We screened n=6156 papers. Seventy-two papers (reporting n=55 different studies) were retained in the review. Most of these studies (n=47) were randomised controlled trials. Our search yielded two main types of interventions: (1) studies with self-management components and (2) technology-based interventions. We synthesised findings across these two models:: the interventions consisted of training of patients and/or caregivers or staff. Some studies reported that interventions had effect in reduction hospital admissions, improving quality of life and reducing costs of care.: consisted of mobile phone, mobile app, tablet/computer and video. Although some interventions showed improvements for self-efficacy, hospitalisations and length of stay, quality of life did not improve across most studies.

DISCUSSION

PCC interventions using self-management have some effects in reducing costs of care and improving quality of life. Technology-based interventions improves self-efficacy but has no effect on quality of life. However, very few studies used self-management and technology approaches. Further work is needed to identify how self-management and technology approaches can be used to manage serious illness.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018108302.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的护理(PCC)正被国际公认为高质量医疗保健的关键属性。国际患者组织联盟将 PCC 定义为以患者而非疾病为中心和组织的护理。我们专注于护理的实施,旨在审查和评估旨在为患有严重身体疾病的患者提供 PCC 的干预措施的证据,并确定 PCC 干预措施的模式。

方法

使用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的文献系统评价。我们在 AMED、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Medline、PsycINFO 中使用以下关键概念进行搜索:患者/以患者为中心的护理、以家庭为中心的护理、以家庭为基础的护理、个体化护理、整体护理、严重疾病、慢性病、从开始到 2022 年 4 月的长期疾病。由于干预措施和研究人群的异质性,我们进行了叙述性综合分析。使用 Joanna Briggs 清单评估研究质量。

结果

我们筛选了 n=6156 篇论文。72 篇论文(报道了 n=55 项不同的研究)被纳入综述。这些研究大多(n=47)为随机对照试验。我们的搜索产生了两种主要类型的干预措施:(1)自我管理组成部分的研究,(2)基于技术的干预措施。我们综合了这两种模式的研究结果:干预措施包括对患者和/或护理人员或工作人员的培训。一些研究报告称,干预措施可减少住院、改善生活质量和降低护理成本。包括手机、移动应用程序、平板电脑/计算机和视频。尽管一些干预措施显示自我效能、住院和住院时间有所改善,但大多数研究并未改善生活质量。

讨论

使用自我管理的 PCC 干预措施在降低护理成本和提高生活质量方面有一定效果。基于技术的干预措施提高了自我效能,但对生活质量没有影响。然而,很少有研究使用自我管理和技术方法。需要进一步研究如何使用自我管理和技术方法来管理严重疾病。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42018108302。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8576/9280891/f8e55a9717b9/bmjopen-2021-054386f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验