Suppr超能文献

门诊老年房颤患者的治疗管理:S.AGES 队列研究。

Therapeutic management in ambulatory elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: the S.AGES cohort.

机构信息

Professor O. Hanon, Hôpital Broca, Service de Gérontologie, 54-56 rue Pascal, Paris, 75013, France. E-mail:

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Feb;19(2):219-27. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0444-9.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Few epidemiologic studies have specifically focused on very old community dwelling population with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of the AF-S.AGES cohort were to describe real-life therapeutic management of non-institutionalized elderly patients with AF according to age groups, i.e., 65-79 and ≥ 80 and to determine the main factors associated with anticoagulant treatment in both groups.

METHODS

Observational study (N=1072) aged ≥ 65 years old, recruited by general practitioners. Characteristics of the sample were first evaluated in the overall sample and according to age (< 80 or ≥ 80 years) and to use of anticoagulant treatment at inclusion. Logistic models were used to analyze the determinants of anticoagulant prescription among age groups.

RESULTS

Mean age was 78.0 (SD=6.5) years and 42% were ≥ 80 years. Nineteen percent had paroxysmal AF, 15% persistent, 56% permanent and 10% unknown type, 77% were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), 17% with antiplatelet therapy with no differences between age groups. Rate-control drugs were more frequently used than rhythm-control drugs (55% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). VKA use was associated with permanent AF, younger age and cancer in patients ≥ 80 years old and with permanent AF and preserved functional autonomy in patients < 80 years old. Hemorrhagic scores were independently associated with non-use of VKA whereas thromboembolic scores were not associated with VKA use.

CONCLUSIONS

In this elderly AF outpatient population, use of anticoagulant therapy was higher even after 80 years than in previous studies suggesting that recent international guidelines are better implemented in the elderly population.

摘要

背景

很少有流行病学研究专门针对伴有房颤(AF)的非常高龄的社区居住人群。AF-S.AGES 队列研究的目的是根据年龄组(65-79 岁和≥80 岁)描述非住院老年 AF 患者的真实治疗管理,并确定两组患者接受抗凝治疗的主要相关因素。

方法

观察性研究(N=1072)纳入年龄≥65 岁的患者,由全科医生招募。首先评估样本的特征,总体样本及根据年龄(<80 岁或≥80 岁)和纳入时是否使用抗凝治疗进行分组。采用 Logistic 模型分析各年龄组抗凝治疗处方的决定因素。

结果

平均年龄为 78.0(SD=6.5)岁,42%的患者年龄≥80 岁。19%为阵发性 AF,15%为持续性 AF,56%为永久性 AF,10%为未知类型,77%接受维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)治疗,17%接受抗血小板治疗,两组间无差异。与节律控制药物相比,控制心率药物的使用更为频繁(55% vs. 37%,p<0.001)。年龄≥80 岁的患者中,永久性 AF、年龄较小和癌症与 VKA 的使用相关,年龄<80 岁的患者中,永久性 AF 和保留的功能自主性与 VKA 的使用相关。出血评分与 VKA 不使用独立相关,血栓栓塞评分与 VKA 使用无关。

结论

在该老年 AF 门诊患者人群中,即使在 80 岁以上,抗凝治疗的使用率也高于以往研究,这表明最近的国际指南在老年人群中得到了更好的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验