Huang Liqiang
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, The People's Republic of China.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1364-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0801-z.
As one of the most classic gestalt phenomena, grouping is often considered to occur preattentively. Therefore, it seems natural to expect conflicting grouping cues to combine preattentively and to lead to an impression of "no grouping." On the other hand, a recent account suggests that grouping by similarity is mediated by the attentional selection of a feature. This account makes the distinctive prediction that for grouping by similarity, but not for low-level groupings (e.g., connectedness, common region), when two conflicting grouping cues are present, the grouping structure will tend to be driven either by one type of cue or by the other type of cue and will usually not lead to the impression of "no grouping." This predicted pattern of results was confirmed in the present study: the presence of two conflicting low-level grouping cues led to reports of "no grouping" in 73.0 % of the trials, but for two similarity grouping cues, "no grouping" was only reported in 25.5 % of the trials. In summary, although low-level grouping cues do indeed work together to determine the perceptual structure preattentively, grouping by similarity is likely mediated by the attentional selection of a feature.
作为最经典的格式塔现象之一,分组通常被认为是在前注意阶段发生的。因此,人们自然而然地期望相互冲突的分组线索在前注意阶段就进行整合,并产生“无分组”的印象。另一方面,最近有观点认为,相似性分组是由对某一特征的注意选择所介导的。这一观点做出了一个独特的预测,即对于相似性分组而言,而不是对于低层次分组(例如连通性、共同区域),当存在两个相互冲突的分组线索时,分组结构往往会由一种线索类型或另一种线索类型主导,通常不会产生“无分组”的印象。本研究证实了这一预测的结果模式:存在两个相互冲突的低层次分组线索时,在73.0%的试验中会报告“无分组”,但对于两个相似性分组线索,只有25.5%的试验报告了“无分组”。总之,虽然低层次分组线索确实会在前注意阶段共同作用以确定感知结构,但相似性分组可能是由对某一特征的注意选择所介导的。