Suppr超能文献

Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation.

作者信息

Świdnicka-Siergiejko Agnieszka, Rosołowski Mariusz, Wróblewski Eugeniusz, Baniukiewicz Andrzej, Dąbrowski Andrzej

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.

出版信息

Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(6):354-60. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.47898. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation modalities have confirmed the superiority of one of these techniques over the others.

AIM

To compare the therapeutic outcomes of the use of a device enabling both injection of adrenaline solution and bipolar electrocoagulation (A + BE) to those of combined adrenaline injection with mechanical therapy (haemostatic clips) (A + HC) in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two subjects with bleeding ulcers were assigned to the A + BE group, and 55 patients were treated with A + HC.

RESULTS

Overall, treatment failed in 20 patients (20/107, 18.7%): in 10 individuals from the A + BE group (10/52; 18.2%) and in 10 individuals from the A + HC group (10/55; 19.2%) (p > 0.05). Primary haemostasis was not obtained in 7 patients (6.5%): in 4 patients in the A + BE group and in 3 patients in the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Ten individuals (9.3%) experienced recurrent bleeding during hospitalisation: 4 patients from the A + BE group and 6 patients from the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Finally, in 96.3% of the patients (n = 103) the endoscopic treatment proved efficient with regards to obtaining haemostasis during hospitalisation. Surgical intervention was required in 4 individuals (3.7%): 2 patients in the A + BE group and 2 patients treated with A + HC (p > 0.05). Three patients (2.8%) - all from the A + HC group - died during hospitalisation. No significant intergroup differences were documented with regards to the mean number of transfused blood units and the mean length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of combined endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding with a probe enabling simultaneous bipolar electrocoagulation and adrenaline injection seems comparable to the widely used dual technique of adrenaline injection and haemostatic clipping.

摘要

相似文献

7
Factors associated with failure of endoscopic injection haemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;36(6):664-8. doi: 10.1080/003655201750163231.
10
Endoscopic injection for bleeding peptic ulcer: a comparison of adrenaline alone with adrenaline plus human thrombin.
Gastroenterology. 1996 Sep;111(3):623-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8780566.

本文引用的文献

2
The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.033.
3
Management of patients with ulcer bleeding.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):345-60; quiz 361. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.480. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):101-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009.
5
Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: an evidence-based approach based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jan;7(1):33-47; quiz 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.016. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
6
Usefulness of prognostic indices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(2):233-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.11.004.
7
Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(2):209-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.10.011.
9
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD005584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005584.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验