Suppr超能文献

瞳孔扩张揭示听觉频谱分辨率对听力努力的影响。

The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

作者信息

Winn Matthew B, Edwards Jan R, Litovsky Ruth Y

机构信息

1Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; and 3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):e153-65. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000145.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study measured the impact of auditory spectral resolution on listening effort. Systematic degradation in spectral resolution was hypothesized to elicit corresponding systematic increases in pupil dilation, consistent with the notion of pupil dilation as a marker of cognitive load.

DESIGN

Spectral resolution of sentences was varied with two different vocoders: (1) a noise-channel vocoder with a variable number of spectral channels; and (2) a vocoder designed to simulate front-end processing of a cochlear implant, including peak-picking channel selection with variable synthesis filter slopes to simulate spread of neural excitation. Pupil dilation was measured after subject-specific luminance adjustment and trial-specific baseline measures. Mixed-effects growth curve analysis was used to model pupillary responses over time.

RESULTS

For both types of vocoder, pupil dilation grew with each successive degradation in spectral resolution. Within each condition, pupillary responses were not related to intelligibility scores, and the effect of spectral resolution on pupil dilation persisted even when only analyzing trials in which responses were 100% correct.

CONCLUSIONS

Intelligibility scores alone were not sufficient to quantify the effort required to understand speech with poor resolution. Degraded spectral resolution results in increased effort required to understand speech, even when intelligibility is at 100%. Pupillary responses were a sensitive and highly granular measurement to reveal changes in listening effort. Pupillary responses might potentially reveal the benefits of aural prostheses that are not captured by speech intelligibility performance alone as well as the disadvantages that are overcome by increased listening effort.

摘要

目的

本研究测量了听觉频谱分辨率对听力努力程度的影响。研究假设频谱分辨率的系统性下降会引发瞳孔扩张相应地系统性增加,这与将瞳孔扩张视为认知负荷指标的观点一致。

设计

使用两种不同的声码器改变句子的频谱分辨率:(1)一种具有可变数量频谱通道的噪声通道声码器;(2)一种设计用于模拟人工耳蜗前端处理的声码器,包括具有可变合成滤波器斜率的峰值提取通道选择,以模拟神经兴奋的扩散。在针对个体的亮度调整和特定试验的基线测量之后测量瞳孔扩张。使用混合效应生长曲线分析来对随时间的瞳孔反应进行建模。

结果

对于这两种类型的声码器,随着频谱分辨率的每次连续下降,瞳孔扩张都会增加。在每种情况下,瞳孔反应与可懂度得分无关,并且即使仅分析反应100%正确的试验,频谱分辨率对瞳孔扩张的影响仍然存在。

结论

仅可懂度得分不足以量化理解分辨率差的语音所需的努力程度。频谱分辨率下降会导致理解语音所需的努力增加,即使可懂度达到100%。瞳孔反应是一种敏感且高度精细的测量方法,可揭示听力努力程度的变化。瞳孔反应可能潜在地揭示仅通过语音可懂度表现无法捕捉到的听觉假体的益处,以及通过增加听力努力而克服的缺点。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.
Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):e153-65. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000145.
2
Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):480-90. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
5
Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):291-300. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182310019.
6
The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
Hear Res. 2018 Sep;367:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
7
Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):584-595. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000958.
9
Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517706396. doi: 10.1177/2331216517706396.
10
The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.069. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Listening Effort for Soft Speech in Quiet.
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251370006. doi: 10.1177/23312165251370006. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
2
Pupillary Responses During a Dual Task: Effect of Noise Attenuation on the Timing of Cognitive Resource Allocation.
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251367630. doi: 10.1177/23312165251367630. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
4
Reduced Neural Distinctiveness of Speech Representations in the Middle-Aged Brain.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jun 18;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00169. eCollection 2025.
5
Pupil Size Tracks the Effects of Global Context and Semantic Ambiguity on Word-Meaning Processing.
J Cogn. 2025 Jul 29;8(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.454. eCollection 2025.
6
Audiovisual Perception of Sentence Stress in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Audiol Res. 2025 Jun 24;15(4):77. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040077.
9
Speech-reading on the lips as a cognitive resource to understand speech in noise.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 May 31;243(7):163. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07117-5.
10
Acoustically Transparent Hearing Aids Increase Physiological Markers of Listening Effort.
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251333225. doi: 10.1177/23312165251333225. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.069. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
2
Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry.
Psychophysiology. 2014 Mar;51(3):277-84. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12151. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
4
Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):763-72. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182967534.
7
Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Aug;56(4):1075-84. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0074). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
8
Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.
Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):23-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01477.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
9
Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users.
Hear Res. 2012 Feb;284(1-2):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
10
Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation.
Hear Res. 2012 Jan;283(1-2):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验