Suppr超能文献

在健康志愿者中进行的一项安慰剂对照研究,比较丁螺环酮与溴西泮对精神运动和认知功能的急性及亚慢性影响。

Placebo-controlled study on acute and subchronic effects of buspirone vs bromazepam utilizing psychomotor and cognitive assessments in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Schaffler K, Klausnitzer W

机构信息

Institute for Pharmacodynamic Research, Munich, FRG.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989 Jan;22(1):26-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014573.

Abstract

The acute and subchronic effects of orally administered buspirone (acute: 15 mg; subchronic: 5 mg t.i.d.; Day 7:5 mg) and bromazepam (acute: 6 mg; subchronic: 2 mg t.i.d.; Day 7: 2 mg) on psychomotor and cognitive parameters were explored vs placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover design with three periods in 12 healthy male volunteers. The washout periods between active treatments lasted one week. Psychomotor and cognitive measurements were taken with the Oculodynamic Text (ODT), which is a computerized psychophysiological online testing device for the simultaneous measurement of electrooculographic and performance (signal identification) parameters. Subjective side effects were recorded with a symptom checklist (41 items) with regard to the first and seventh day of administration. Intradiurnal assessments were done at 0, +1, +3, and +5 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 7 of each of the three randomized treatment periods. Buspirone behaved placebo-like in the EOG and signal-identification parameters after acute and subchronic administration. After bromazepam the respective parameters were significantly impaired--acutely as well as subchronically. Acute and subchronic buspirone was significantly superior to bromazepam with regard to the majority of psychophysiological parameters. The incidence of acute side effects was higher for both active treatments than for placebo. With buspirone there were fewer acute and subchronic side effects than with bromazepam. The side effect profiles of the three preparations were different. With regard to all active treatments the incidence of side effects was lower on Day 7 after the subchronic dosing period--with a third of the subchronic dose--than after the first single administration.

摘要

在一项随机、双盲交叉设计中,对12名健康男性志愿者进行了三个阶段的研究,比较口服丁螺环酮(急性剂量:15毫克;亚慢性剂量:5毫克,每日三次;第7天:5毫克)和溴西泮(急性剂量:6毫克;亚慢性剂量:2毫克,每日三次;第7天:2毫克)与安慰剂相比,对精神运动和认知参数的急性和亚慢性影响。活性治疗之间的洗脱期持续一周。使用眼动动力学测试(ODT)进行精神运动和认知测量,这是一种用于同时测量眼电图和性能(信号识别)参数的计算机化心理生理在线测试设备。使用症状清单(41项)记录给药第一天和第七天的主观副作用。在三个随机治疗阶段的每个阶段的第1天和第7天,在给药后0、+1、+3和+5小时进行日内评估。急性和亚慢性给药后,丁螺环酮在眼电图和信号识别参数方面表现得与安慰剂相似。溴西泮给药后,相应参数在急性和亚慢性情况下均受到显著损害。在大多数心理生理参数方面,急性和亚慢性丁螺环酮明显优于溴西泮。两种活性治疗的急性副作用发生率均高于安慰剂。丁螺环酮的急性和亚慢性副作用比溴西泮少。三种制剂的副作用谱不同。对于所有活性治疗,亚慢性给药期后第7天(亚慢性剂量的三分之一)的副作用发生率低于首次单次给药后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验