Suppr超能文献

自体动静脉内瘘的血流量、静压比和静脉传导率:三种监测方法的比较

Volume blood flow, static pressure ratio and venous conductance in native arterio-venous fistulae: three surveillance methods compared.

作者信息

King David H, Paulson William D, Al-Qaisi Mo, Taylor Michael G, Panayiotopoulos Yiannis, Abeygunarsekara Sumith, Chan Anthony, Ali Galil, Chemla Eric S

机构信息

1 Renal Unit, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex - UK.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):211-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000324. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dialysis venous pressure monitoring has been widely recommended as a surveillance method but has not been shown to improve access outcomes in randomised controlled trials. The method has been impaired by the need to either turn off the blood pump or to derive the static venous pressure from the venous pressure measured with the dialysis pump running. We have developed a unique algorithm which converts Doppler-shifted spectral information derived from unscaled pulsatile blood flow waveforms into an estimate of mean blood pressure (MBP) at the point of ultrasound insonation.

METHODS

We have devised the unique expression shown here: MBP = MAP/(1 + Pff/Vff) where MAP is the mean arterial pressure, Pff = (systolic - diastolic)/MAP measured on the contralateral arm and Vff = spectral maximum - minimum/mean. Venous conductance (VC) can be measured by combining this pressure data with Duplex ultrasound blood flow data. A new device BlueDop™ has been used to illustrate the potential clinical value of non-invasive static pressure ratio (SPRn) in a monitoring role. Duplex and BlueDop™ technology were tested in an arterio-venous fistula (AVF) study in which VC, Q and SPRn were compared. Thresholds used for detection of ≥60% venous stenosis were VC <10 mL min-1 mm Hg-1, Q <500 mL min-1, SPRn >0.56.

RESULTS

The following accuracy was achieved: VC = 96%, Q = 92%, SPRn = 76% with similar accuracy in predicting premature thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A new algorithm has been described and its in vivo accuracy in estimating mean 'pressure from flow' has been confirmed. Two new variables and a new dedicated instrument BlueDop™ have been demonstrated in clinical use.

摘要

目的

透析静脉压力监测作为一种监测方法已被广泛推荐,但在随机对照试验中尚未显示能改善血管通路结局。该方法因需要关闭血泵或在透析泵运行时从测量的静脉压力中获取静态静脉压力而受到影响。我们开发了一种独特的算法,可将从未缩放的脉动血流波形导出的多普勒频移光谱信息转换为超声探测点处的平均血压(MBP)估计值。

方法

我们设计了此处所示的独特表达式:MBP = MAP/(1 + Pff/Vff),其中MAP是平均动脉压,Pff =(收缩压 - 舒张压)/对侧手臂测量的MAP,Vff = 光谱最大值 - 最小值/平均值。静脉电导(VC)可通过将此压力数据与双功超声血流数据相结合来测量。一种新型设备BlueDop™已被用于说明无创静态压力比(SPRn)在监测中的潜在临床价值。在一项动静脉内瘘(AVF)研究中测试了双功和BlueDop™技术,比较了VC、Q和SPRn。用于检测≥60%静脉狭窄的阈值为VC <10 mL min-1 mm Hg-1、Q <500 mL min-1、SPRn >0.56。

结果

实现了以下准确率:VC = 96%,Q = 92%,SPRn = 76%,在预测过早血栓形成方面准确率相似。

结论

已描述了一种新算法,并证实了其在体内估计平均“血流压力”的准确性。两种新变量和一种新型专用仪器BlueDop™已在临床应用中得到展示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验