• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以60度进行会阴切开术:我们做得有多好?

Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we?

作者信息

Naidu Madhu, Kapoor Dharmesh S, Evans Sarah, Vinayakarao Latha, Thakar Ranee, Sultan Abdul H

机构信息

Croydon University Hospital, 530, London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):813-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2625-9. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-015-2625-9
PMID:25656454
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Episiotomy is regarded as the most common maternal obstetric surgical procedure. It is associated with a significant increase in blood loss, lower pelvic floor muscle strength, dyspareunia, and perineal pain compared with a perineal tear. We tested the hypothesis that all doctors and midwives can perform an episiotomy when prompted to, specifically cut at 60° from the midline (in a simulation model).

METHODS

Doctors and midwives attending the BMFMS Annual Meeting (2014), Croydon Perineal Trauma Course and staff at Poole General Hospital were invited to cut a paper replica of the perineum with a commonly used episiotomy incision pad. Participants were prompted to cut an episiotomy at 60° to the perineal midline with the anus as a reference point. The angles and distances were measured using protractors and rulers. A 58-62° band was deemed acceptable to account for measurement errors.

RESULTS

A total of 106 delegates participated. Only 15 % of doctors and midwives cut an episiotomy between 58 and 62°. Over one third (36 %) cut the episiotomy between 55 and 65° (inclusive). Nearly two thirds either underestimated the angle (<55°; 44 %), or overestimated the angle (>66°; 18 %). Thirty-six and 7.5 % of episiotomies were cut at <50 and >70° respectively. The origination point of the episiotomy was 5 mm away from the midline (IQR 1-8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

This original observational study shows that doctors and midwives were poor at cutting at the prompted episiotomy angle of 60°. This highlights the need to develop structured training programmes to improve the visual accuracy of estimating angles or the use of fixed angle devices to help improve the ability to estimate the desired angle.

摘要

引言与假设

会阴切开术被视为最常见的产妇产科外科手术。与会阴撕裂相比,它会导致失血量显著增加、盆底肌肉力量下降、性交困难和会阴疼痛。我们检验了这样一个假设:所有医生和助产士在接到提示时都能进行会阴切开术,具体而言是在模拟模型中从中线处以60°角进行切割。

方法

邀请参加2014年BMFMS年会、克罗伊登会阴创伤课程的医生和助产士以及普尔总医院的工作人员,使用常用的会阴切开术切口垫切割会阴的纸质复制品。以肛门为参考点,提示参与者以60°角与会阴中线进行会阴切开术。使用量角器和尺子测量角度和距离。考虑到测量误差,58 - 62°的范围被视为可接受。

结果

共有106名代表参与。只有15%的医生和助产士切割的会阴切开术角度在58至62°之间。超过三分之一(36%)的人切割的会阴切开术角度在55至65°之间(含两端)。近三分之二的人要么低估了角度(<55°;44%),要么高估了角度(>66°;18%)。分别有36%和7.5% 的会阴切开术角度切割在<50°和>70°。会阴切开术的起始点距离中线5毫米(四分位距1 - 8毫米)。

结论

这项原创性观察研究表明,医生和助产士在按照提示的60°角进行会阴切开术时表现不佳。这凸显了制定结构化培训计划以提高估计角度的视觉准确性或使用固定角度装置来帮助提高估计所需角度能力的必要性。

相似文献

1
Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we?以60度进行会阴切开术:我们做得有多好?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):813-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2625-9. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
2
Episiotomy: What angle do you cut to the midline?会阴切开术:你向中线的切割角度是多少?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
3
Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle?会阴侧切术:受过培训的助产士和医生是否从不同角度看待它?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
4
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].[会阴撕裂与会阴切开术:手术操作 - CNGOF产科会阴预防与保护指南]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees.评估 60 度会阴侧切术的切口角度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;112(3):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.015. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
6
Comparative study of episiotomy angles achieved by cutting with straight Mayo scissors and the EPISCISSORS-60 in a birth simulation model.在分娩模拟模型中,使用直型梅奥剪刀和EPISCISSORS-60剪刀进行会阴切开术时所形成角度的比较研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jul;28(7):1063-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3227-x. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
7
Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit.我们的会阴切开术操作是否正确?一项在高危产科病房评估法国技术的研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep;47(7):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
8
Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.初产妇会阴侧切两种切口角度的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jul;40(7):1877-82. doi: 10.1111/jog.12432.
9
Different episiotomy techniques, postpartum perineal pain, and blood loss: an observational study.不同的会阴切开术技术、产后会阴疼痛及失血情况:一项观察性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1960-3. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
10
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.产科肛门括约肌损伤:解剖学因素及可改变的第二产程干预措施综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?会阴切开术:印度产科医生的操作角度正确吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):214-218. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01871-8. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Evaluation of Episiotomy Characteristics of EPISCISSORS-60 Scissors Compared with Mayo Scissors: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.与梅奥剪刀相比,评估EPISCISSORS - 60剪刀的会阴切开术特性:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 May 20;37:55. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.55. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model.使用训练模型评估会阴侧切切口的准确性。
Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
2
Evaluation of the angled Episcissors-60(®) episiotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveries.在自然阴道分娩中对60°角会阴侧切剪(Episcissors-60(®))的评估。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jul 31;7:253-6. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S66901. eCollection 2014.
3
Effect of different episiotomy techniques on perineal pain and sexual activity 3 months after delivery.
质量改进项目对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率的影响:一项采用多中心、阶梯式设计的研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):584-592. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16396. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
4
Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对“产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包”国家质量改进计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035674.
5
Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.初产妇真空辅助分娩中侧切术与不侧切术对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025050.
6
Evaluation of Accuracy of Episiotomy Incision in a Governmental Maternity Unit in Palestine: An Observational Study.巴勒斯坦一家政府妇产单位会阴切开术切口准确性的评估:一项观察性研究。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Oct 29;2018:6345497. doi: 10.1155/2018/6345497. eCollection 2018.
7
A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.一项旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)发生率的多中心质量改进项目:研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1965-0.
8
Comparative study of episiotomy angles achieved by cutting with straight Mayo scissors and the EPISCISSORS-60 in a birth simulation model.在分娩模拟模型中,使用直型梅奥剪刀和EPISCISSORS-60剪刀进行会阴切开术时所形成角度的比较研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jul;28(7):1063-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3227-x. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
Evaluation of training programme uptake in an attempt to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries: the SUPPORT programme.为减少产科肛门括约肌损伤而进行的培训项目接受情况评估:SUPPORT项目。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):403-407. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3158-6. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
10
Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom.英国两家医院引入EPISCISSORS-60(®)前后未生育女性产科肛门括约肌损伤情况的比较
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Dec 9;7:949-55. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S94680. eCollection 2015.
不同会阴切开术技术对产后3个月会阴疼痛及性功能的影响
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Dec;25(12):1629-37. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2401-2. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device, the Episcissors-60.以正确角度进行会阴侧切术:新型器械Episcissors-60的评估
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Feb 21;7:23-8. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S60056. eCollection 2014.
5
Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle?会阴侧切术:受过培训的助产士和医生是否从不同角度看待它?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
6
The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.在荷兰低危人群中使用会阴切开术:二次分析。
Birth. 2013 Dec;40(4):247-55. doi: 10.1111/birt.12060.
7
Different episiotomy techniques, postpartum perineal pain, and blood loss: an observational study.不同的会阴切开术技术、产后会阴疼痛及失血情况:一项观察性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1960-3. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
8
Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.会阴切开术的特征和产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险:一项病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees.评估 60 度会阴侧切术的切口角度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;112(3):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.015. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
Episiotomy for vaginal birth.经阴道分娩时行会阴切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.