Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Brain Injury Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA,
Department of Psychology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, 00185, Italy, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, 00179, Italy.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Aug;10(8):1038-44. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu155. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Given the determinant role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in valuation, we examined whether vmPFC lesions also modulate how people scale political beliefs. Patients with penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI; N = 102) and healthy controls (HCs; N = 31) were tested on the political belief task, where they rated 75 statements expressing political opinions concerned with welfare, economy, political involvement, civil rights, war and security. Each statement was rated for level of agreement and scaled along three dimensions: radicalism, individualism and conservatism. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analysis showed that diminished scores for the radicalism dimension (i.e. statements were rated as less radical than the norms) were associated with lesions in bilateral vmPFC. After dividing the pTBI patients into three groups, according to lesion location (i.e. vmPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC] and parietal cortex), we found that the vmPFC, but not the dlPFC, group had reduced radicalism scores compared with parietal and HC groups. These findings highlight the crucial role of the vmPFC in appropriately valuing political behaviors and may explain certain inappropriate social judgments observed in patients with vmPFC lesions.
鉴于腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)在评估中的决定性作用,我们研究了 vmPFC 损伤是否也会调节人们如何对政治信仰进行评估。我们对 102 名穿透性脑外伤(pTBI)患者和 31 名健康对照者(HCs)进行了政治信仰任务的测试,在该任务中,他们对 75 个表达与福利、经济、政治参与、公民权利、战争和安全相关的政治观点的陈述进行了评价。每个陈述都按照三个维度进行了同意程度的评分:激进主义、个人主义和保守主义。基于体素的病变-症状映射(VLSM)分析表明,激进主义维度的评分降低(即陈述被评为比规范更不激进)与双侧 vmPFC 的病变有关。在根据病变位置(即 vmPFC、背外侧前额叶皮层 [dlPFC] 和顶叶皮层)将 pTBI 患者分为三组后,我们发现与顶叶和 HC 组相比,只有 vmPFC 组而非 dlPFC 组的激进主义评分降低。这些发现强调了 vmPFC 在适当评估政治行为方面的关键作用,并可能解释了 vmPFC 损伤患者中观察到的某些不适当的社会判断。