• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪孕39周前择期分娩的可行性:来自加利福尼亚三个项目的经验教训。

The Feasibility of Tracking Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Gestational Weeks: Lessons From Three California Projects.

作者信息

Korst Lisa M, Fridman Moshe, Estarziau Melanie, Gregory Kimberly D, Mitchell Connie

机构信息

Childbirth Research Associates, North Hollywood, CA, USA.

AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2015 Oct;19(10):2128-37. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1725-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-015-1725-y
PMID:25656731
Abstract

The tracking of elective deliveries (ED) prior to 39 gestational weeks has become a mandatory requirement for all hospitals with ≥1,100 deliveries for accreditation by The Joint Commission (TJC); however, the feasibility and accuracy of monitoring efforts remain problematic for many hospitals. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of three operational approaches to tracking ED. We used mixed methods to evaluate the feasibility of 3 different approaches to tracking ED: (1) using administrative data, (2) using electronic medical record (EMR) data, and (3) using targeted data collection in a county-wide quality improvement (QI) effort. For (1), we analyzed data from the California 2009 linked birth cohort dataset, and calculated hospital rates of ED using TJC technical specifications. For (2), we performed a case study of a project that recruited hospitals to provide EMR data for the TJC measure calculation. For (3), we performed a case study of a project that recruited hospitals to prospectively track elective inductions of labor. For (1), hospital discharge data were insufficient without supplementation from the EMR or birth certificate. For (2), legal and operational issues surrounding data sharing, and non-standardized data elements prohibited hospital participation. For (3), the QI approach successfully established policies and data collection systems yet lacked infrastructure to assure sustainability at a hospital or regional level. In summary, ED tracking required the coordination and support of multiple resources to enable hospitals to satisfactorily report on this measure.

摘要

对孕39周前的择期分娩(ED)进行追踪,已成为所有年分娩量≥1100例的医院通过联合委员会(TJC)认证的一项强制性要求;然而,对许多医院来说,监测工作的可行性和准确性仍然存在问题。在此,我们评估了三种追踪ED的操作方法的可行性。我们采用混合方法评估了3种不同的ED追踪方法的可行性:(1)使用行政数据,(2)使用电子病历(EMR)数据,以及(3)在全县范围的质量改进(QI)工作中使用目标数据收集。对于(1),我们分析了来自加利福尼亚2009年关联出生队列数据集的数据,并根据TJC技术规范计算了医院的ED率。对于(2),我们对一个招募医院提供EMR数据用于TJC指标计算的项目进行了案例研究。对于(3),我们对一个招募医院前瞻性追踪择期引产的项目进行了案例研究。对于(1),若无EMR或出生证明的补充,医院出院数据并不充足。对于(2),围绕数据共享的法律和操作问题,以及非标准化的数据元素阻碍了医院的参与。对于(3),QI方法成功建立了政策和数据收集系统,但缺乏在医院或区域层面确保可持续性的基础设施。总之,ED追踪需要多种资源的协调和支持,以使医院能够令人满意地报告这一指标。

相似文献

1
The Feasibility of Tracking Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Gestational Weeks: Lessons From Three California Projects.追踪孕39周前择期分娩的可行性:来自加利福尼亚三个项目的经验教训。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Oct;19(10):2128-37. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1725-y.
2
The perinatal quality collaborative of North Carolina's 39 weeks project: a quality improvement program to decrease elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation.北卡罗来纳州围产期质量协作组织的39周项目:一项旨在减少妊娠39周前择期分娩的质量改进计划。
N C Med J. 2014 May-Jun;75(3):169-76. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.3.169.
3
Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.通过人工病历审查与数据供应商识别早期选择性分娩之间的差异
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016 Dec;75(12):367-372.
4
Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Early Elective Deliveries and Improve Birth Registry Accuracy.全州范围的质量改进计划,以减少早期选择性剖宫产并提高出生登记准确性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;131(4):688-695. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002516.
5
Decline in early elective deliveries across the United States.美国早期择期分娩数量下降。
CMAJ. 2014 May 13;186(8):E244. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4766. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
Changes in delivery methods at specialty care hospitals in the United States between 2006 and 2010.2006 年至 2010 年期间美国专科医院分娩方式的变化。
J Perinatol. 2013 Dec;33(12):919-23. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.90. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
7
Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.早期选择性分娩占医疗补助计划支付费用的分娩总数的近9%。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2170-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0534.
8
A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.一项旨在减少非医学指征计划性分娩的全州质量改进倡议。
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Apr;21(4):932-941. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2196-5.
9
[Timing of elective term caesarean sections; trends in the Netherlands].[择期足月剖宫产的时机;荷兰的趋势]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6951.
10
The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.剖宫产与引产的关系。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01346.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of electronic versus manual abstraction for 2 standardized perinatal care measures.电子与手动摘要对 2 项标准化围产保健措施的比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):789-797. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab276.
2
Examining Trends in Obstetric Quality Measures for Monitoring Health Care Disparities.检查监测医疗保健差异的产科质量措施的趋势。
Med Care. 2018 Jun;56(6):470-476. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000919.

本文引用的文献

1
Births: final data for 2011.出生情况:2011年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Jun 28;62(1):1-69, 72.
2
Determining the rate of elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation: methodology matters.确定 39 孕周前选择性分娩的发生率:方法很重要。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):173-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318258ff4b.
3
Oversight of elective early term deliveries: avoiding unintended consequences.选择性早期早产分娩的监管:避免意外后果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
4
Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.指征性晚期早产儿和早期足月儿的分娩时机。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):323-333. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182255999.
5
Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review.围产儿人群健康数据库中的数据质量:系统评价。
Med Care. 2012 Apr;50(4):e7-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d2b1d.
6
The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.语境对医疗质量改进成功的影响:文献系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):500-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x.
7
National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary.国家医院出院调查:2007年总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Oct 26(29):1-20, 24.
8
The science of quality improvement implementation: developing capacity to make a difference.质量改进实施的科学:培养产生影响的能力。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e1709c.
9
Late preterm birth: how often is it avoidable?晚期早产:其发生频率有多高是可以避免的?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):404.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.066. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
10
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第107号:引产
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5.