时间分配方式对一所拥有两个校区的药学院学生学业成绩的影响。
Impact of time allocation practices on academic outcomes for students from a 2-campus pharmacy school.
作者信息
Congdon Heather Brennan, Morgan Jill A, Lebovitz Lisa
机构信息
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Rockville, Maryland.
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
出版信息
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):179. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810179.
OBJECTIVE
To assess how students from 2 campuses spent their time during P1-P3 (first through third) years, and whether that time allocation impacted their APPE grades and NAPLEX performance.
METHODS
Data from 2 graduating classes were gathered, including baseline student demographics, academic performance, licensing examination scores and pass rates, and an annual internal student survey. For the survey, students were asked how much time they spent each week on class attendance, watching recorded lectures, studying and course-related activities, school-sponsored extracurricular activities, and work. Data was analyzed by campus for the 3 years (P1-P3) and then evaluated separately as individual academic years.
RESULTS
There were statistical differences between campuses in attending class, watching recorded lectures, and participating in school activities. However, there was no statistical difference between the 2 campuses in APPE grades, NAPLEX scores, or pass rates.
CONCLUSION
How students from these 2 campuses spent their time during pharmacy school was not predictive of academic success.
目的
评估来自两个校区的学生在P1 - P3（第一年至第三年）期间如何分配时间，以及这种时间分配是否会影响他们的高级药学实践经验（APPE）成绩和北美的执业药师执照考试（NAPLEX）表现。
方法
收集了两个毕业班的数据，包括学生的基本人口统计学信息、学业成绩、执照考试分数及通过率，以及一项年度校内学生调查。在调查中，学生被问及他们每周花多少时间在上课、观看录制的讲座、学习及与课程相关的活动、学校组织的课外活动和工作上。数据按校区分析了三年（P1 - P3）的情况，然后又按各个学年分别进行了评估。
结果
两个校区在上课、观看录制讲座和参加学校活动方面存在统计学差异。然而，两个校区在APPE成绩、NAPLEX分数或通过率方面没有统计学差异。
结论
这两个校区的学生在药学院期间的时间分配方式并不能预测学业成就。
Zotero 插件