Singer David, McLaughlin Jacqueline E, Cox Wendy C
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):121. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807121.
To assess the multiple mini-interview (MMI) as an admission tool for a satellite campus. In 2013, the MMI was implemented as part of a new admissions model at the UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy. From fall 2013 to spring 2015, 73 candidates were interviewed by 15 raters on the satellite campus in Asheville, North Carolina. A many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) with three facets was used to determine the variance in candidate ratings attributable to rater severity, candidate ability, and station difficulty. Candidates were surveyed to explore their perceptions of the MMI. Rasch measures accounted for 48.3% of total variance in candidate scores. Rater severity accounted for 9.1% of the variance, and candidate ability accounted for 36.2% of the variance. Eighty percent of survey respondents (strongly) agreed that interviewers got to know them based on questions they answered This study suggests that the MMI is a useful and valid tool for candidate selection at a satellite campus.
评估多重迷你面试(MMI)作为卫星校区招生工具的效果。2013年,MMI作为北卡罗来纳大学埃谢尔曼药学院新招生模式的一部分得以实施。从2013年秋季到2015年春季,15名评分者在北卡罗来纳州阿什维尔的卫星校区对73名候选人进行了面试。采用具有三个层面的多面Rasch测量法(MFRM)来确定候选人评分差异中可归因于评分者严格程度、候选人能力和站点难度的部分。对候选人进行了调查,以了解他们对MMI的看法。Rasch测量法占候选人分数总方差的48.3%。评分者严格程度占方差的9.1%,候选人能力占方差的36.2%。80%的调查受访者(强烈)同意面试官通过他们回答的问题了解了他们。本研究表明,MMI是卫星校区选拔候选人的一种有用且有效的工具。