Suppr超能文献

西格玛指标在加纳临床化学实验室质量控制评估中的应用:一项试点研究。

Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality control in clinical chemistry laboratory in Ghana: A pilot study.

作者信息

Afrifa Justice, Gyekye Seth A, Owiredu William K B A, Ephraim Richard K D, Essien-Baidoo Samuel, Amoah Samuel, Simpong David L, Arthur Aaron R

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Technology, University of Cape Coast, Kumasi, Ghana.

Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

Niger Med J. 2015 Jan-Feb;56(1):54-8. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.149172.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sigma metrics provide a uniquely defined scale with which we can assess the performance of a laboratory. The objective of this study was to assess the internal quality control (QC) in the clinical chemistry laboratory of the University of Cape Cost Hospital (UCC) using the six sigma metrics application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used commercial control serum [normal (L1) and pathological (L2)] for validation of quality control. Metabolites (glucose, urea, and creatinine), lipids [triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)], enzymes [alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (AST)], electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride) and total protein were assessed. Between-day imprecision (CVs), inaccuracy (Bias) and sigma values were calculated for each control level.

RESULTS

Apart from sodium (2.40%, 3.83%), chloride (2.52% and 2.51%) for both L1 and L2 respectively, and glucose (4.82%), cholesterol (4.86%) for L2, CVs for all other parameters (both L1 and L2) were >5%. Four parameters (HDL-C, urea, creatinine and potassium) achieved sigma levels >1 for both controls. Chloride and sodium achieved sigma levels >1 for L1 but <1 for L2. In contrast, cholesterol, total protein and AST achieved sigma levels <1 for L1 but >1 for L2. Glucose and ALP achieved a sigma level >1 for both control levels whereas TG achieved a sigma level >2 for both control levels.

CONCLUSION

Unsatisfactory sigma levels (<3) where achieved for all parameters using both control levels, this shows instability and low consistency of results. There is the need for detailed assessment of the analytical procedures and the strengthening of the laboratory control systems in order to achieve effective six sigma levels for the laboratory.

摘要

背景

西格玛指标提供了一个独特定义的尺度,我们可以用它来评估实验室的性能。本研究的目的是使用六西格玛指标应用评估开普海岸大学医院(UCC)临床化学实验室的内部质量控制(QC)。

材料与方法

我们使用商业对照血清[正常(L1)和病理(L2)]进行质量控制验证。评估了代谢物(葡萄糖、尿素和肌酐)、脂质[甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)]、酶[碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)]、电解质(钠、钾、氯)和总蛋白。计算每个对照水平的日间不精密度(CVs)、不准确性(偏差)和西格玛值。

结果

除L1和L2的钠(分别为2.40%、3.83%)、氯(分别为2.52%和2.51%)以及L2的葡萄糖(4.82%)、胆固醇(4.86%)外,所有其他参数(L1和L2)的CVs均>5%。四个参数(HDL-C、尿素、肌酐和钾)在两个对照中均达到西格玛水平>1。氯和钠在L1时西格玛水平>1,但在L2时<1。相比之下,胆固醇、总蛋白和AST在L1时西格玛水平<1,但在L2时>1。葡萄糖和ALP在两个对照水平下均达到西格玛水平>1,而TG在两个对照水平下均达到西格玛水平>2。

结论

使用两个对照水平时,所有参数的西格玛水平均不令人满意(<3),这表明结果不稳定且一致性较低。需要对分析程序进行详细评估并加强实验室控制系统,以便实验室达到有效的六西格玛水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ffb/4314861/ae5997c6a3b6/NMJ-56-54-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验