Zerbib A, Mølvig J, Thomsen M, Coppin H, Cambon-Thomsen A, Sommer E, Nerup J, De Preval C
Unité INSERM U100/CRPG CNRS (UPR0039) Université Toulouse III, France.
Dis Markers. 1989 Jan-Mar;7(1):27-41.
We have investigated restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of HLA and non-HLA regions of the genome in the homogeneous Danish population. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients and healthy individuals were selected for being HLA-DR 3/4 heterozygous to evaluate the influence of genes other than DR on disease susceptibility. Five different probes were used: HLA alpha and beta DQ (chromosome 6), the Ins 310 genomic fragment which detects a polymorphic region 5' to the insulin gene (chromosome 11), and cDNA for the constant regions of the T cell receptor alpha and beta genes (chromosomes 14 and 7). Fifteen cells homozygous for the HLA-D region were used to obtain reference DNA patterns. This allowed us to describe four splits among the HLA-DQw3 haplotypes (DQw3.1 to DQw3.4). The two new haplotypes DQw3.3 and DQw3.4 do not code for the TA10 serological marker which is found on DQw3.1 positive cells. One-hundred per cent of IDDM patients were typed as DQw3.2 versus 68 per cent for controls (p = 0.003). However, our results do not indicate a role for the Ins 310 or for the alpha DX locus region in IDDM susceptibility, in contrast to previous reports by others. The restriction enzymes that we have used did not reveal significant differences between DNA patterns of patients and controls with probes for the constant region of the T cell receptor genes.
我们在同质化的丹麦人群中研究了基因组中HLA和非HLA区域的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)。选择胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者和健康个体作为HLA-DR 3/4杂合子,以评估DR以外的基因对疾病易感性的影响。使用了五种不同的探针:HLAα和β DQ(第6号染色体)、检测胰岛素基因5'端多态性区域的Ins 310基因组片段(第11号染色体)以及T细胞受体α和β基因恒定区的cDNA(第14号和第7号染色体)。使用15个HLA-D区域纯合的细胞来获得参考DNA图谱。这使我们能够描述HLA-DQw3单倍型中的四种分型(DQw3.1至DQw3.4)。两种新的单倍型DQw3.3和DQw3.4不编码在DQw3.1阳性细胞上发现的TA10血清学标志物。100%的IDDM患者被分型为DQw3.2,而对照组为68%(p = 0.003)。然而,与其他人之前的报告相反,我们的结果并未表明Ins 310或α DX基因座区域在IDDM易感性中起作用。我们使用的限制性内切酶未显示患者和对照组T细胞受体基因恒定区探针的DNA图谱之间存在显著差异。