Suppr超能文献

一项关于度洛西汀治疗慢性疲劳综合征患者全身疲劳的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验。

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of duloxetine in the treatment of general fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

作者信息

Arnold Lesley M, Blom Thomas J, Welge Jeffrey A, Mariutto Elizabeth, Heller Alicia

机构信息

Women's Health Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Psychosomatics. 2015 May-Jun;56(3):242-53. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

METHODS

A 12-week, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare duloxetine 60-120 mg/d (n = 30) with placebo (n = 30) for efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. The primary outcome measure was the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory general fatigue subscale (range: 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue). Secondary measures were the remaining Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory subscales, Brief Pain Inventory, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Symptom Inventory, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression of Severity. The primary analysis of efficacy for continuous variables was a longitudinal analysis of the intent-to-treat sample, with treatment-by-time interaction as the measure of effect.

RESULTS

The improvement in the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory general fatigue scores for the duloxetine group was not significantly greater than for the placebo group (P = 0.23; estimated difference between groups at week 12 = -1.0 [95% CI: -2.8, 0.7]). The duloxetine group was significantly superior to the placebo group on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mental fatigue score, Brief Pain Inventory average pain severity and interference scores, Short Form-36 bodily pain domain, and Clinical Global Impression of Severity score. Duloxetine was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The primary efficacy measure of general fatigue did not significantly improve with duloxetine when compared with placebo. Significant improvement in secondary measures of mental fatigue, pain, and global measure of severity suggests that duloxetine may be efficacious for some chronic fatigue syndrome symptom domains, but larger controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

评估度洛西汀治疗慢性疲劳综合征患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

设计一项为期12周的随机双盲研究,比较度洛西汀60 - 120mg/d(n = 30)与安慰剂(n = 30)治疗慢性疲劳综合征患者的疗效和安全性。主要结局指标为多维疲劳量表总体疲劳分量表(范围:4 - 20,分数越高表明疲劳程度越高)。次要指标为多维疲劳量表其余分量表、简明疼痛量表、医学结局研究简明健康调查量表-36、医院焦虑抑郁量表、疾病控制与预防中心症状量表、患者总体改善印象和临床总体严重程度印象。对连续变量疗效的主要分析是对意向性治疗样本进行纵向分析,以治疗×时间交互作用作为效应量度。

结果

度洛西汀组多维疲劳量表总体疲劳评分的改善并不显著大于安慰剂组(P = 0.23;第12周组间估计差异=-1.0 [95%CI:-2.8,0.7])。度洛西汀组在多维疲劳量表精神疲劳评分、简明疼痛量表平均疼痛严重程度和干扰评分、简明健康调查量表躯体疼痛领域以及临床总体严重程度印象评分方面显著优于安慰剂组。度洛西汀总体耐受性良好。

结论

与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀治疗总体疲劳的主要疗效指标未显著改善。精神疲劳、疼痛和总体严重程度次要指标的显著改善表明度洛西汀可能对某些慢性疲劳综合征症状领域有效,但需要更大规模的对照试验来证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验