Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Geriatrics, St Olav Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1623-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Most patients with hip fractures are characterised by older age (>70 years), frailty, and functional deterioration, and their long-term outcomes are poor with increased costs. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of giving these patients comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated geriatric ward versus the usual orthopaedic care.
We did a prospective, single-centre, randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial. Between April 18, 2008, and Dec 30, 2010, we randomly assigned home-dwelling patients with hip-fractures aged 70 years or older who were able to walk 10 m before their fracture, to either comprehensive geriatric care or orthopaedic care in the emergency department, to achieve the required sample of 400 patients. Randomisation was achieved via a web-based, computer-generated, block method with unknown block sizes. The primary outcome, analysed by intention to treat, was mobility measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) 4 months after surgery for the fracture. The type of treatment was not concealed from the patients or staff delivering the care, and assessors were only partly masked to the treatment during follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00667914.
We assessed 1077 patients for eligibility, and excluded 680, mainly for not meeting the inclusion criteria such as living in a nursing home or being aged less than 70 years. Of the remaining patients, we randomly assigned 198 to comprehensive geriatric care and 199 to orthopaedic care. At 4 months, 174 patients remained in the comprehensive geriatric care group and 170 in the orthopaedic care group; the main reason for dropout was death. Mean SPPB scores at 4 months were 5·12 (SE 0·20) for comprehensive geriatric care and 4·38 (SE 0·20) for orthopaedic care (between-group difference 0·74, 95% CI 0·18-1·30, p=0·010).
Immediate admission of patients aged 70 years or more with a hip fracture to comprehensive geriatric care in a dedicated ward improved mobility at 4 months, compared with the usual orthopaedic care. The results suggest that the treatment of older patients with hip fractures should be organised as orthogeriatric care.
Norwegian Research Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority, St Olav Hospital Trust and Fund for Research and Innovation, Liaison Committee between Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, the Department of Neuroscience at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Foundation for Scientific and Industrial Research at the Norwegian Institute of Technology (SINTEF), and the Municipality of Trondheim.
大多数髋部骨折患者的特点是年龄较大(>70 岁)、虚弱和功能恶化,长期预后较差,成本增加。我们比较了在专门的老年病房为这些患者提供综合老年护理与常规骨科护理的效果和成本效益。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、单中心、随机、平行组、对照试验。在 2008 年 4 月 18 日至 2010 年 12 月 30 日期间,我们随机分配了年龄在 70 岁或以上、在骨折前能行走 10 米、居住在家中的髋部骨折患者,接受综合老年护理或骨科护理,以在急诊科达到所需的 400 名患者样本。通过基于网络的、计算机生成的、未知块大小的块方法进行随机分组。主要结局是通过手术治疗骨折后 4 个月时使用简短体能测试(SPPB)测量的移动能力。治疗方法没有向患者或提供护理的工作人员隐瞒,评估员在随访期间仅对治疗部分进行了掩蔽。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00667914。
我们评估了 1077 名患者的资格,并排除了 680 名患者,主要是因为不符合纳入标准,如居住在养老院或年龄小于 70 岁。在剩余的患者中,我们随机分配 198 名患者接受综合老年护理,199 名患者接受骨科护理。在 4 个月时,综合老年护理组有 174 名患者和骨科护理组有 170 名患者仍在接受治疗;主要的退出原因是死亡。综合老年护理组 4 个月时的 SPPB 评分平均为 5.12(SE 0.20),骨科护理组为 4.38(SE 0.20)(组间差异 0.74,95%CI 0.18-1.30,p=0.010)。
年龄在 70 岁或以上的髋部骨折患者立即入住专门病房接受综合老年护理,与常规骨科护理相比,4 个月时的移动能力得到改善。结果表明,老年髋部骨折患者的治疗应组织为老年骨科护理。
挪威研究理事会、挪威中部地区卫生局、圣奥拉夫医院信托基金和创新基金、挪威科技大学与挪威中部地区卫生局之间的联络委员会、挪威科技大学神经科学系、挪威技术研究所的科学与工业研究基金会(SINTEF)和特隆赫姆市。