Smith Tanya A, Asimakopoulos George
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 May;20(5):658-61. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu447. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, in [patients undergoing off-pump CABG] are [postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes] acceptable when performed by [trainees]? Altogether more than 597 papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Six retrospective cohort studies directly compared the performance of trainees and experienced surgeons in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Of the remaining papers, one recorded the performance of trainees in on- and off-pump operations and finally one paper evaluated a single trainee's performance in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, both supervised and unsupervised, over a 1-year period. It is important to note that the two respective cohort studies included in our analysis compared similar cohorts of patients. However, both studies were included in our paper as they provide additional information regarding trainee performance. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Although a heterogeneous range of postoperative complications were recorded in the identified studies, we were able to determine that, overall, there was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality seen in operations performed by trainees or experienced surgeons. The incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke were also similar among cases performed by both groups. However, senior surgeons were more likely to operate on patients with more complex or severe disease, or those requiring more urgent operations. Therefore, it was not possible to directly compare outcomes between trainees and experienced surgeons in operations of similar complexity. However, we conclude that despite the absence of randomized controlled trials comparing the performance of trainees and experienced surgeons in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, the evidence provided in this paper supports the involvement of trainees in performing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery as a reliable and safe alternative to on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected cases.
一篇心脏外科的最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是,在[接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的患者中],由[实习医生]进行手术时,[术后死亡率和发病率结果]是否可接受?通过报告的检索共找到597多篇论文,其中8篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。六项回顾性队列研究直接比较了实习医生和经验丰富的外科医生在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的表现。在其余论文中,一篇记录了实习医生在体外循环和非体外循环手术中的表现,最后一篇论文评估了一名实习医生在1年期间在有监督和无监督情况下进行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术的表现。需要注意的是,我们分析中纳入的两项队列研究比较的是相似的患者队列。然而,这两项研究都被纳入我们的论文,因为它们提供了有关实习医生表现的额外信息。这些论文的作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、研究的患者组、研究类型、相关结果和结果以表格形式列出。尽管在所确定的研究中记录了各种不同的术后并发症,但我们能够确定,总体而言,实习医生或经验丰富的外科医生进行的手术中30天死亡率没有显著差异。两组病例中心肌梗死和中风的发生率也相似。然而,资深外科医生更有可能为病情更复杂或严重的患者,或需要更紧急手术的患者进行手术。因此,不可能直接比较实习医生和经验丰富的外科医生在类似复杂程度手术中的结果。然而,我们得出结论,尽管缺乏比较实习医生和经验丰富的外科医生在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植(OPCAB)手术中表现的随机对照试验,但本文提供的证据支持在某些情况下,实习医生参与进行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术,作为体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术的一种可靠且安全的替代方法。