Urso Stefano, Sadaba Justo Rafael, Pettinari Matteo
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):188-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr071. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, does the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate have an impact on post-operative results? Altogether more than 420 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated and ordered according to the sample size. In the 14 RCTs reviewed, the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate incidence ranged from 0 to 13.3%. The most frequent causes of conversion were haemodynamic instability and intramyocardial-coronary target. A low conversion rate (<2%) was reported by five studies. Three of them did not show any difference in terms of mortality between the OPCAB and on-pump groups, one showed better survival of the OPCAB group at 5 years, and one reported better early survival of the OPCAB group. Three of these trials describe a high OPCAB experience and reported that patients undergoing OPCAB had a shorter post-operative stay and lower morbidity compared with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Five RCTs showed a high conversion rate (>9%), and among them, one reported lower morbidity of the OPCAB patients, three were not able to show any benefit in terms of morbidity of the OPCAB, and one reported worse survival and patency graft rate of the OPCAB group. Four RCTs reported conversion rates ranging from 3.7 to 7.0%, describing a wide spectrum of results. We conclude that RCTs with a high off-pump to on-pump conversion rate were often associated with a lower experience in OPCAB of the surgeons participating in the trials. These studies were also mostly unable to show any benefit in terms of mortality or morbidity of OPCAB over the on-pump strategy. On the contrary, a low conversion rate is mostly reported by RCTs with a high structured experience in OPCAB. These trials were mostly able to show a benefit, in terms of morbidity and survival, of the OPCAB over the on-pump strategy.
一篇心脏外科的最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是:在接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)的患者中,非体外循环转体外循环的转化率是否会对术后结果产生影响?通过报告的检索共找到420多篇论文,其中14项随机对照试验(RCT)代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文的作者、期刊、发表日期和国家、研究的患者组、研究类型、相关结局和结果按样本量列表并排序。在审查的14项RCT中,非体外循环转体外循环的转化率范围为0至13.3%。最常见的转换原因是血流动力学不稳定和心肌内冠状动脉靶点。五项研究报告了低转化率(<2%)。其中三项研究未显示OPCAB组和体外循环组在死亡率方面有任何差异,一项研究显示OPCAB组在5年时生存率更高,另一项研究报告OPCAB组早期生存率更高。这些试验中有三项描述了丰富的OPCAB经验,并报告与接受体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者相比,接受OPCAB的患者术后住院时间更短,发病率更低。五项RCT显示高转化率(>9%),其中一项报告OPCAB患者发病率较低,三项未能显示OPCAB在发病率方面有任何益处,一项报告OPCAB组生存率和移植血管通畅率较差。四项RCT报告的转化率在3.7%至7.0%之间,描述了广泛的结果。我们得出结论,非体外循环转体外循环转化率高的RCT通常与参与试验的外科医生在OPCAB方面经验较少有关。这些研究大多也未能显示OPCAB在死亡率或发病率方面比体外循环策略有任何益处。相反,OPCAB结构化经验丰富的RCT大多报告了低转化率。这些试验大多能够显示出OPCAB在发病率和生存率方面比体外循环策略更具优势。