Zheng Cheng, Zhao Lihui, Wang Jixian
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Celgene International, Boudry, Switzerland.
Pharm Stat. 2015 May-Jun;14(3):180-8. doi: 10.1002/pst.1672. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
Bioequivalence (BE) studies are designed to show that two formulations of one drug are equivalent and they play an important role in drug development. When in a design stage, it is possible that there is a high degree of uncertainty on variability of the formulations and the actual performance of the test versus reference formulation. Therefore, an interim look may be desirable to stop the study if there is no chance of claiming BE at the end (futility), or claim BE if evidence is sufficient (efficacy), or adjust the sample size. Sequential design approaches specially for BE studies have been proposed previously in publications. We applied modification to the existing methods focusing on simplified multiplicity adjustment and futility stopping. We name our method modified sequential design for BE studies (MSDBE). Simulation results demonstrate comparable performance between MSDBE and the original published methods while MSDBE offers more transparency and better applicability. The R package MSDBE is available at https://sites.google.com/site/modsdbe/.
生物等效性(BE)研究旨在证明同一药物的两种制剂是等效的,它们在药物开发中起着重要作用。在设计阶段,制剂的变异性以及受试制剂与参比制剂的实际性能可能存在高度不确定性。因此,如果最终没有机会宣称生物等效性(无效性),进行期中分析可能有助于停止研究;如果证据充分(有效性),则宣称生物等效性,或者调整样本量。之前在出版物中已经提出了专门用于生物等效性研究的序贯设计方法。我们对现有方法进行了改进,重点是简化多重性调整和无效性停止。我们将我们的方法命名为生物等效性研究的改进序贯设计(MSDBE)。模拟结果表明,MSDBE与最初发表的方法具有可比的性能,同时MSDBE具有更高的透明度和更好的适用性。R包MSDBE可在https://sites.google.com/site/modsdbe/获取。