Sadat-Ali Mir, Elshaboury Ezzat, Al-Omran Abdallah S, Azam Md Quamar, Syed Anjum, Gullenpet Abid Hussain
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Jan-Apr;5(1):21-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.149228.
Bone mineral density measurements with absorptiometry dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing low bone mass and risk for fragility fractures. DXA is not available at every center, and physicians require an alternative method of diagnosis before referring patients. We conducted this study to assess and compare total cortical thickness (TCT) and its relation to the T score by DXA and its correlation-ship in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Total cortical thickness was carried out in 50 Saudi Arabian females ≥ 45 years with DXA scans and 25 patients with age of ≤ 35 years whose radiographs of the upper tibia were available for analysis. Postero-medial cortical thickness of the tibia was measured 13 cm from the joint line and an average was calculated. The average T score of the spine and the hip was taken. A comparison was made between age, T score, and the TCT. Inter cortical distance (ICD) was measured and compared in both groups. Data were analyzed for predictive value for diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis.
There was a significant association between the T score and the TCT and age. As the age advanced the T score and TCT was very low (<0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] <0.2). Forty patients were osteopenic and 10 osteoporotic. The T score in the former was - 1.33 ± 0.71 and the later was - 3.22 ± 0.56 (P < 0.0001 95% CI: <-1.67) and the TCT was 0.655 ± 0.06 versus 0.51 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001 95% CI: <-0.17). In women ≤35 years the average TCT was 0.804 ± 0.155 cm and IMD was 3.34 ± 0.45 cm.
We conclude that if TCT is less than the threshold value of ≤ 0.5 cm, patients should be referred for further investigations with DXA. We believe that further studies are needed to confirm our findings and in areas where DXA is not available, based on the TCT measurement anti-osteoporotic therapy could be initiated when other risk factors for osteoporosis is present.
采用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量骨密度是诊断低骨量和脆性骨折风险的金标准。并非每个中心都能进行DXA检查,医生在转诊患者前需要一种替代诊断方法。我们开展本研究以评估和比较总皮质厚度(TCT)及其与DXA测得的T值的关系,以及它们在骨质疏松症诊断中的相关性。
对50名年龄≥45岁且已进行DXA扫描的沙特阿拉伯女性以及25名年龄≤35岁且有胫骨上段X线片可供分析的患者进行总皮质厚度测量。在距关节线13厘米处测量胫骨后内侧皮质厚度并计算平均值。记录脊柱和髋部的平均T值。对年龄、T值和TCT进行比较。测量并比较两组的皮质间距离(ICD)。分析数据对骨质减少和骨质疏松症诊断的预测价值。
T值与TCT及年龄之间存在显著关联。随着年龄增长,T值和TCT非常低(<0.05,95%置信区间[CI]<0.2)。40名患者为骨质减少,10名患者为骨质疏松。前者的T值为-1.33±0.71,后者为-3.22±0.56(P<0.0001,95%CI:<-1.67),TCT分别为0.655±0.06和0.51±0.05(P<0.0001,95%CI:<-0.17)。在≤35岁的女性中,平均TCT为0.804±0.155厘米,IMD为3.34±0.45厘米。
我们得出结论,如果TCT小于≤0.5厘米的阈值,应将患者转诊进行进一步的DXA检查。我们认为需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现,并且在无法进行DXA检查的地区,当存在其他骨质疏松风险因素时,基于TCT测量结果可以启动抗骨质疏松治疗。