Roff Sue
a University of Dundee and Education Consultant , UK.
Med Teach. 2015 Aug;37(8):783-786. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009022. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
The suggestion that empathy "declines" or "erodes" as students progress through medical school has largely rested on observations reported from Jefferson Medical College in the United States using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) developed by Hojat and colleagues. Now that the student version of JSPE has been administered to medical students in more than a dozen countries, it is timely to consider whether or not the Jefferson "case study" and the conclusions drawn from it are generalisable.
A literature research was conducted on MEDLINE in mid-2014 to identify studies reporting administrations of the Student version of JPSE (JSPE-S) to cohorts of medical students and the means for studies and their sub-parts conducted in Japan, South Korea, China, Kuwait, India, Iran, UK, USA, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Portugal.
The means of these studies from a dozen countries outside the USA consistently cluster round 75% out of the possible maximum of 140 unlike the early Jefferson studies (although the later Jefferson means are also <120).
These observations may support Costa et al.'s contention that "a latent growth model suggests that empathy of medical students does not decline over time" (p. 509) - or at least not significantly. But in order to understand the maturation process of medical students and trainees we need to develop more sophisticated, integrated models that combine culturally-sensitive concepts of emotional intelligence and moral reasoning with far more refined understandings of the nature of empathy required for the safe practice of patient-centred medicine.
随着医学生在医学院学习进程的推进,同理心“下降”或“衰退”这一观点很大程度上基于美国杰斐逊医学院的观察报告,这些报告使用的是由霍贾特及其同事开发的杰斐逊医生同理心量表(JSPE)。如今,JSPE的学生版已在十几个国家施用于医学生,现在是时候思考杰斐逊“案例研究”及其得出的结论是否具有普遍性了。
2014年年中在MEDLINE上进行了文献研究,以确定报告对医学生群体施用JSPE学生版(JSPE-S)的研究,以及在日本、韩国、中国、科威特、印度、伊朗、英国、美国、澳大利亚、巴西、哥伦比亚、多米尼加共和国和葡萄牙开展的研究及其子部分的方法。
来自美国以外十几个国家的这些研究的平均分始终集中在可能的最高140分中的75%左右,这与杰斐逊早期的研究不同(尽管杰斐逊后期的平均分也<120)。
这些观察结果可能支持科斯塔等人的观点,即“潜在增长模型表明医学生的同理心不会随时间下降”(第509页)——或者至少不会显著下降。但为了理解医学生和实习生的成熟过程,我们需要开发更复杂、综合的模型,将文化敏感的情商和道德推理概念与对以患者为中心的安全医疗实践所需同理心本质的更精细理解结合起来。