Suppr超能文献

巴林特小组在提升医学和护理教育中的同理心方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of Balint groups at improving empathy in medical and nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):1089. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06098-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Empathy is crucial for patient health. The Balint group is a commonly used method for empathy training. However, the impact of Balint groups on empathy remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to assess the impact of Balint groups on empathy training among medical and nursing students, as well as doctors and nurses.

METHODS

This review involved searching multiple databases for relevant articles. Rigorous eligibility criteria were applied during the screening of titles and abstracts, and during the selection of records. Following a full-text eligibility evaluation, two reviewers independently extracted data from the final selection of studies, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated to assess the systematic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in Balint groups demonstrated a significant increase in empathy than those in the control group (SMD = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-2.06; p < 0.001). Studies conducted in China (SMD = 2.13, 95% CI 1.27-2.99; p < 0.001) revealed a greater impact of Balint groups on empathy than those conducted in France (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.37; p < 0.001). The impact of Balint groups was significantly greater among physicians (SMD = 2.50, 95% CI 1.79-3.21; p < 0.001) and nurses (SMD = 2.88, 95% CI 1.34-4.43; p < 0.001) compared to medical students (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.35-1.06; p < 0.001). Participants who attended ten or more sessions (SMD = 2.37, 95% CI 1.35-3.39; p < 0.001) demonstrated better outcomes compared to those who attended fewer than ten sessions (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI 0.30-1.29; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Balint groups are effective for empathy training among doctors, nurses, and medical students. Future research should incorporate patient-led measurements to evaluate empathy and ascertain the long-term impact of Balint groups on empathy training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42023488247.

摘要

目的

同理心对患者健康至关重要。巴林特小组是一种常用于同理心培训的方法。然而,巴林特小组对同理心的影响仍不清楚。本系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析旨在评估巴林特小组对医学生、医生和护士的同理心培训的影响。

方法

本综述通过搜索多个数据库来寻找相关文章。在筛选标题和摘要以及选择记录时,应用了严格的入选标准。在对最终入选研究进行全文资格评估后,两名评审员独立从研究中提取数据,并进行荟萃分析。采用标准化均数差(SMD)评估系统结果。

结果

本系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入 11 项研究。与对照组相比,参加巴林特小组的参与者表现出明显更高的同理心(SMD=1.46,95%置信区间[CI]0.86-2.06;p<0.001)。在中国进行的研究(SMD=2.13,95%CI1.27-2.99;p<0.001)显示,巴林特小组对同理心的影响大于在法国进行的研究(SMD=0.24,95%CI0.12-0.37;p<0.001)。与医学生相比,医生(SMD=2.50,95%CI1.79-3.21;p<0.001)和护士(SMD=2.88,95%CI1.34-4.43;p<0.001)参加巴林特小组的效果更为显著。参加十次或以上课程的参与者(SMD=2.37,95%CI1.35-3.39;p<0.001)比参加少于十次课程的参与者(SMD=0.79,95%CI0.30-1.29;p<0.01)表现出更好的结果。

结论

巴林特小组对医生、护士和医学生的同理心培训有效。未来的研究应纳入以患者为导向的测量方法来评估同理心,并确定巴林特小组对同理心培训的长期影响。

试验注册

PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42023488247。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c2/11451191/c1043abfcc5a/12909_2024_6098_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验