Schmitt Hannah, Ferdinand Nicola K, Kray Jutta
Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66041, Saarbrücken, Germany,
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):416-34. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0335-x.
Recent evidence has indicated that neuronal activity related to reward anticipation benefits subsequent stimulus processing, but the effect of penalties remains largely unknown. Since the dual-mechanisms-of-control theory (DMC; Braver & Barch, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 809-81, 2002) assumes that temporal differences in context updating underlie age differences in cognitive control, in this study we investigated whether motivational cues (signaling the chance to win or the risk to lose money, relative to neutral cues) preceding context information in a modified AX-CPT paradigm influence the temporal stages of context processing in younger and older adults. In the behavioral data, younger adults benefited from gain cues, evident in their enhanced context updating, whereas older adults exhibited slowed responding after motivational cues, irrespective of valence. Event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed that the enhanced processing of motivational cues in the P2 and P3b was mainly age-invariant, whereas age-differential effects were found for the ERP correlates of context processing. Younger adults showed improved context maintenance (i.e., a larger negative-going CNV), as well as increased conflict detection (larger N450) and resolution (indicated by a sustained positivity), whenever incorrect responding would lead to a monetary loss. In contrast, motivationally salient cues benefited context representations (in cue-locked P3b amplitudes), but increased working memory demands during response preparation (via a temporally prolonged P3b) in older adults. In sum, motivational valence and salience effects differentially modulated the temporal stages of context processing in younger and older adults. These results are discussed in terms of the DMC theory, recent findings of emotion regulation in old age, and the relationship between cognitive and affective processing.
最近的证据表明,与奖励预期相关的神经元活动有利于后续的刺激处理,但惩罚的影响在很大程度上仍不清楚。由于控制双机制理论(DMC;Braver和Barch,《神经科学与生物行为评论》,26,809 - 81,2002)假设情境更新中的时间差异是认知控制年龄差异的基础,在本研究中,我们调查了在修改后的AX - CPT范式中,先于情境信息的动机线索(相对于中性线索,表明赢钱机会或输钱风险)是否会影响年轻人和老年人情境处理的时间阶段。在行为数据中,年轻人从收益线索中受益,这在他们增强的情境更新中很明显,而老年人在动机线索后反应减慢,无论效价如何。事件相关电位(ERP)显示,P2和P3b中动机线索处理的增强主要与年龄无关,而情境处理的ERP相关指标存在年龄差异效应。每当错误反应会导致金钱损失时,年轻人表现出更好的情境维持(即更大的负向CNV),以及增加的冲突检测(更大的N450)和冲突解决(以持续的正电位表示)。相比之下,动机显著线索有利于情境表征(线索锁定的P3b振幅),但在老年人中增加了反应准备期间的工作记忆需求(通过时间延长的P3b)。总之,动机效价和显著性效应以不同方式调节年轻人和老年人情境处理的时间阶段。我们从DMC理论、老年情绪调节的最新发现以及认知与情感处理之间的关系等方面讨论了这些结果。