• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非开普敦公共部门和私营部门的急性阑尾炎情况

Acute appendicitis in the public and private sectors in Cape Town, South Africa.

作者信息

Yang Estin, Cook Colin, Kahn Delawir

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road L223, Portland, OR, 97239, USA,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1700-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3002-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-015-3002-z
PMID:25665677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

South Africa has a low incidence of acute appendicitis, but poor outcomes. However, South African studies on appendicitis focus solely on public hospitals, neglecting those who utilize private facilities. This study aims to compare appendicitis characteristics and outcomes in public and private hospitals in South Africa.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted among two public and three private hospitals in the Cape Town metropole, from September 2013 to March 2014. Hospital records, operative notes, and histology results were reviewed for patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Patients were interviewed during their hospitalization and followed up at monthly intervals until normal function was attained.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were enrolled, with 73 in the public and 61 in the private sector. Education and employment were higher among private sector patients. Public sector patients had a higher rupture rate (30.6 vs 13.2 %, p = 0.023). Times to presentation were not statistically different between the two cohorts. Public sector patients had longer hospital stays (5.3 vs 2.9 days, p = 0.036) and longer return to work times (23.0 vs 12.1 days, p < 0.0001). Although complication rates were similar, complications in public hospitals were more severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Public sector patients in South Africa with appendicitis have higher rupture rates, worse complications, longer hospital stays, and longer recoveries than private sector patients. Patients with perforation had longer delays in presentation than patients without perforation.

摘要

背景

南非急性阑尾炎发病率较低,但治疗效果不佳。然而,南非关于阑尾炎的研究仅聚焦于公立医院,忽视了那些使用私立医疗机构的患者。本研究旨在比较南非公立医院和私立医院阑尾炎的特征及治疗效果。

方法

2013年9月至2014年3月,在开普敦大都市的两家公立医院和三家私立医院开展了一项前瞻性队列研究。对因急性阑尾炎接受阑尾切除术的患者的医院记录、手术记录和组织学结果进行了回顾。在患者住院期间进行访谈,并每月随访一次,直至其功能恢复正常。

结果

共纳入134例患者,其中公立医院73例,私立医院61例。私立医院患者的教育程度和就业率更高。公立医院患者的阑尾破裂率更高(30.6%对13.2%,p = 0.023)。两组患者的就诊时间无统计学差异。公立医院患者的住院时间更长(5.3天对2.9天,p = 0.036),恢复工作的时间更长(23.0天对12.1天,p < 0.0001)。虽然并发症发生率相似,但公立医院的并发症更严重。

结论

南非公立医院阑尾炎患者比私立医院患者的阑尾破裂率更高、并发症更严重、住院时间更长且恢复时间更长。穿孔患者的就诊延迟时间比未穿孔患者更长。

相似文献

1
Acute appendicitis in the public and private sectors in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦公共部门和私营部门的急性阑尾炎情况
World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1700-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3002-z.
2
Appendectomy. Comparative study between a public and a private hospital.阑尾切除术。一家公立医院与一家私立医院的对比研究。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Sep-Oct;56(5):522-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000500011.
3
Complex bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative outcomes analysis of patients treated in tertiary private and public health facilities in Cape Town, South Africa.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后复杂胆管损伤:南非开普敦私立和公立三级医疗机构治疗患者的疗效对比分析
S Afr J Surg. 2019 Sep;57(3):24-29.
4
Management and outcomes for children with acute appendicitis differ by hospital type: areas for improvement at public hospitals.急性阑尾炎患儿的管理与治疗结果因医院类型而异:公立医院有待改进的方面。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Jun;48(5):499-504. doi: 10.1177/0009922809332586. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Audit of appendicectomies at Frere Hospital, Eastern Cape.东开普省弗雷尔医院阑尾切除术审计
S Afr J Surg. 2008 Aug;46(3):74-7.
6
Appendicitis: what does really make the difference between private and public hospitals?阑尾炎:私立医院和公立医院的真正区别是什么?
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 26;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-15.
7
Quantifying the disparity in outcome between urban and rural patients with acute appendicitis in South Africa.量化南非急性阑尾炎城乡患者结局差异。
S Afr Med J. 2013 Jul 29;103(10):742-5. doi: 10.7196/samj.7109.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.复杂性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:术后因素评估
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21.
9
County versus private hospitals: access of care, management and outcomes for patients with appendicitis.县级医院与私立医院:阑尾炎患者的医疗服务可及性、管理及治疗结果
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):283-6. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376509.
10
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare Disparities in the Treatment and Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in South Africa.南非肝细胞癌治疗与预后中的医疗保健差异
World J Surg. 2025 May;49(5):1290-1297. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12559. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Chest Trauma Outcomes: Public Versus Private Level I Trauma Centers.胸部创伤结局:公立与私立一级创伤中心比较。
World J Surg. 2020 Jun;44(6):1824-1834. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05400-w.
3
'We are all serving the same Ugandans': A nationwide mixed-methods evaluation of private sector surgical capacity in Uganda.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的穿孔风险随着对其认识和手术的延误而增加。
J Surg Res. 2013 Oct;184(2):723-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.008. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
2
Acute appendicitis in a developing country.发展中国家的急性阑尾炎。
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2068-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1626-9.
3
Inequities in access to health care in South Africa.南非医疗保健获取方面的不平等现象。
“我们都在为同一位乌干达人服务”:乌干达全国私营部门外科能力的混合方法评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0224215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224215. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Costs Associated with Laparoscopic Appendectomy in a Middle-Income Country with Universal Health Coverage.在一个具有全民健康覆盖的中等收入国家,腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床结局与医疗费用
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4777-5.
J Public Health Policy. 2011;32 Suppl 1:S102-23. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2011.35.
4
A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis.南非德班324例因急性阑尾炎切除的阑尾的临床病理回顾:一项回顾性分析
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Nov;91(8):688-92. doi: 10.1308/003588409X12486167521677.
5
The health and health system of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges.南非的健康与卫生系统:当前公共卫生挑战的历史根源
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):817-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60951-X. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
6
Audit of appendicectomies at Frere Hospital, Eastern Cape.东开普省弗雷尔医院阑尾切除术审计
S Afr J Surg. 2008 Aug;46(3):74-7.
7
Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis.成人急性阑尾炎中延迟对穿孔风险的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1823-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9373-6. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
8
Insurance status, but not race, predicts perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis.保险状况而非种族可预测成年急性阑尾炎患者的穿孔情况。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Sep;205(3):445-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
9
How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.时间如何影响阑尾炎破裂的风险。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.