Lee Steven L, Yaghoubian Arezou, Kaji Amy
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson Street, Box 25, Torrance, CA, 90509, USA.
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):283-6. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376509.
Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status may affect healthcare access (higher appendiceal perforation [AP] rates), management (lower laparoscopic appendectomy [LA] rates), and outcomes in patients with appendicitis. This study determines if disparities exist between county and private hospitals.
A review of patients > or = 18 years treated for appendicitis from 1998 through 2007 was performed. Data from a county hospital were compared to data from 12 private hospitals. Study outcomes included length of hospitalization (LOH), and rates of AP, LA, and abscess drainage. Predictor variables collected included age, sex, race/ ethnicity, per-capita income, and hospital type.
For this study, 16,512 patients were identified (county = 1,293, private = 15,219). On univariate analysis, patients at the county hospital had lower mean per-capita incomes ($13,412 vs. $17,584, P<.0001), similar AP rates at presentation (26% vs. 24%, P = .10), and lower abscess drainage (0.2% vs. 2.1%, P < .0001). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated a higher AP (OR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.6) and LA rate (OR 1.9, CI 1.7-2.2), a lower abscess drainage rate (0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.27), and longer LOH (parameter estimate = 0.4, P<.0001) at the county hospital. Within the county hospital cohort, LOH and rates of AP, LA, and. abscess drainage were similar across all races/ethnicities and income levels.
When compared to private hospital patients, adults with appendicitis treated at a county hospital were of lower socioeconomic background, had higher AP rates and longer LOH, but were more likely to undergo LA and less likely to require abscess drainage. Since racial and socioeconomic disparities were no longer apparent once within the county hospital cohort, these differences may be due to differences in access to healthcare.
种族/民族以及社会经济地位可能会影响阑尾炎患者的医疗服务可及性(阑尾穿孔[AP]发生率较高)、治疗方式(腹腔镜阑尾切除术[LA]发生率较低)以及治疗结果。本研究旨在确定县级医院与私立医院之间是否存在差异。
对1998年至2007年期间接受阑尾炎治疗的18岁及以上患者进行回顾性研究。将一家县级医院的数据与12家私立医院的数据进行比较。研究结果包括住院时间(LOH)、AP发生率、LA发生率以及脓肿引流率。收集的预测变量包括年龄、性别、种族/民族、人均收入以及医院类型。
本研究共纳入16,512例患者(县级医院1,293例,私立医院15,219例)。单因素分析显示,县级医院患者的平均人均收入较低(13,412美元对17,584美元,P<.0001),就诊时的AP发生率相似(26%对24%,P = .10),脓肿引流率较低(0.2%对2.1%,P < .0001)。然而,多因素分析表明,县级医院的AP发生率较高(OR 1.4,CI 1.2 - 1.6)和LA发生率较高(OR 1.9,CI 1.7 - 2.2),脓肿引流率较低(0.07,95%CI 0.02 - 0.27),住院时间较长(参数估计值 = 0.4,P<.0001)。在县级医院队列中,所有种族/民族和收入水平的患者在住院时间、AP发生率、LA发生率以及脓肿引流率方面相似。
与私立医院患者相比,在县级医院接受治疗的阑尾炎成年患者社会经济背景较低,AP发生率较高,住院时间较长,但更有可能接受LA治疗,且脓肿引流的需求较低。由于在县级医院队列中种族和社会经济差异不再明显,这些差异可能归因于医疗服务可及性的不同。