• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲厌食症群体中的网络抗污名化现象

Online Stigma Resistance in the Pro-Ana Community.

作者信息

Yeshua-Katz Daphna

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2015 Oct;25(10):1347-58. doi: 10.1177/1049732315570123. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/1049732315570123
PMID:25667161
Abstract

Media scholars often use concepts from Goffman's dramaturgical approach to study online communities of stigmatized individuals as "backstages," spaces where members take refuge from social disapproval. In this study, I extend this view through an examination of in-depth interviews with bloggers from the "pro-ana" community, an online community for people with eating disorders. To explore how this community uses an online environment that is both anonymous and public, I fuse Goffman's ideas about identity performance and stigma with more recent theories about boundary maintenance. In-depth interviews with "pro-ana" bloggers reveal that to protect this virtual group and resist stigmas associated both with their illness and with their online presence, they construct their own norms and rules in the online realm, and discipline and eject members deemed to be out-group.

摘要

媒体学者经常运用戈夫曼戏剧化方法中的概念,将受污名化个体的在线社区视为“后台”,即成员躲避社会非议的空间。在本研究中,我通过对“亲厌食症”社区博主的深度访谈拓展了这一观点,该社区是一个针对饮食失调者的在线社区。为探究这个社区如何利用既匿名又公开的网络环境,我将戈夫曼关于身份表演和污名的观点与关于边界维持的最新理论相结合。对“亲厌食症”博主的深度访谈表明,为了保护这个虚拟群体并抵制与他们的疾病以及网络形象相关的污名,他们在网络领域构建了自己的规范和规则,并对被视为群体外的成员进行约束和驱逐。

相似文献

1
Online Stigma Resistance in the Pro-Ana Community.亲厌食症群体中的网络抗污名化现象
Qual Health Res. 2015 Oct;25(10):1347-58. doi: 10.1177/1049732315570123. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
2
Communicating stigma: the pro-ana paradox.传播污名:支持厌食症的悖论。
Health Commun. 2013;28(5):499-508. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.699889. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
3
Managing Stigma: Disclosure-Response Communication Patterns in Pro-Anorexic Websites.应对污名化:亲厌食症网站中的披露-回应沟通模式
Health Commun. 2016;31(2):217-29. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.946218. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
4
"I am a waste of breath, of space, of time": metaphors of self in a pro-anorexia group.“我是对呼吸、空间和时间的浪费”:一个支持厌食症群体中的自我隐喻。
Qual Health Res. 2015 Feb;25(2):189-204. doi: 10.1177/1049732314550004. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
A content analysis of an online pro-eating disorder community on Reddit.对 Reddit 上一个支持进食障碍的线上社区进行的内容分析。
Body Image. 2018 Mar;24:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Disordered eating and group membership among members of a pro-anorexic online community.进食障碍与厌食症线上社群成员的群体归属
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Jan;20(1):9-12. doi: 10.1002/erv.1096. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
7
["Pro Ana": Psychodynamic References for Anorexia Nervosa].["亲厌食症”:神经性厌食症的精神动力学参考]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2017 Feb;66(2):88-103. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2017.66.2.88.
8
Pro-eating disorder communities on social networking sites: a content analysis.社交网站上的亲进食障碍群体:一项内容分析。
Eat Disord. 2010 Oct-Dec;18(5):393-407. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2010.511918.
9
Social interactions in online eating disorder communities: A network perspective.网络视角下的线上饮食失调症群体的社交互动
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0200800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200800. eCollection 2018.
10
What's eating the internet? Content and perceived harm of pro-eating disorder websites.是什么在吞噬互联网?饮食失调支持网站的内容及感知到的危害。
Eat Behav. 2015 Dec;19:139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
'You Are Not Alone, We've Got You': Power Plays, Devotion, and Punishment on Healthy Eating and Pro-Eating Disorder Websites.“你并不孤单,我们与你同在”:健康饮食和支持进食障碍网站中的权力博弈、奉献和惩罚。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Oct;34(12):1216-1230. doi: 10.1177/10497323241238628. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Coping with loneliness and stigma associated with HIV in a resource-limited setting, making a case for mental health interventions; a sequential mixed methods study.在资源有限的环境中应对与 HIV 相关的孤独和污名化,为心理健康干预措施提出理由;一项顺序混合方法研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04643-w.
3
The Social Construction of a Concept-Orthorexia Nervosa: Morality Narratives and Psycho-Politics.
一种概念——神经性正食症的社会建构:道德叙事与心理政治学
Qual Health Res. 2020 Jun;30(7):1101-1113. doi: 10.1177/1049732320911364.
4
Overcoming Alzheimer's Disease Stigma by Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies.利用人工智能和区块链技术克服阿尔茨海默病污名化问题。
Brain Sci. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):183. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10030183.
5
Addressing Stigma Through a Virtual Community for People Living with HIV: A Mixed Methods Study of the PositiveLinks Mobile Health Intervention.通过一个针对 HIV 感染者的虚拟社区来应对污名化:PositiveLinks 移动健康干预的混合方法研究。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Oct;22(10):3395-3406. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2174-6.
6
Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 2-Application to Peer Group Processes and Future Directions for Research.社交媒体背景下青少年同伴关系的转变:第 2 部分-对同伴群体过程的应用及未来研究方向。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;21(3):295-319. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9.