Dean J W, Lab M J
Department of Physiology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London.
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1309-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92697-4.
Various mechanisms have been suggested to explain the high prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure, but as yet there is no unifying theory. There is growing evidence that changes in myocardial mechanical properties may directly alter cardiac electrophysiology by a process of mechanoelectric feedback. Moreover, when changes in cardiac loading similar to those seen in heart failure are produced experimentally in normal heart, there is a greater tendency to arrhythmogenesis. The intimate relation between changes in mechanical function and arrhythmia in heart failure could account for the lack of effect of most conventional antiarrhythmic drugs on arrhythmogenesis, and the beneficial effect of peripheral vasodilators. This paper argues that mechanically induced changes in electrophysiology are very important in the development of arrhythmia in cardiac failure; there may be no need to implicate other mechanisms, such as relative ischaemia, metabolic changes, or changes in sympathetic tone.
人们提出了各种机制来解释心力衰竭患者室性心律失常的高患病率,但目前尚无统一的理论。越来越多的证据表明,心肌机械特性的改变可能通过机电反馈过程直接改变心脏电生理。此外,当在正常心脏中通过实验产生与心力衰竭中相似的心脏负荷变化时,发生心律失常的倾向更大。心力衰竭中机械功能变化与心律失常之间的密切关系可以解释大多数传统抗心律失常药物对心律失常发生无效的原因,以及外周血管扩张剂的有益作用。本文认为,机械诱导的电生理变化在心力衰竭心律失常的发生中非常重要;可能无需涉及其他机制,如相对缺血、代谢变化或交感神经张力变化。