Cöster Maria, Rosengren Björn, Carlsson Åke, Montgomery Fredrik, Karlsson Magnus
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lunds universitet - Ortopediska kliniken Malmö, Sweden Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lunds universitet - Ortopediska kliniken Malmö, Sweden.
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lunds universitet - Ortopediska kliniken, SUS, Malmö Malmö, Sweden Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lunds universitet - Ortopediska kliniken, SUS, Malmö Malmö, Sweden.
Lakartidningen. 2015 Feb 10;112:C9LS.
There is need for structured evaluation of disability before and after surgery. The patients' subjective aspects of their symptoms should be one part of this evaluation, preferably captured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). There are several PROMs, either generic or region-specific questionnaires, but no » gold standard « for foot or ankle evaluation. We translated the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and evaluated the psychometric properties of the score in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients with a variety of foot and ankle disorders. In this report we recommend a validation process for PROMs and report that SEFAS shows good results when doing this. As SEFAS is a PROM, the instrument seems suitable for use in national registers.
术前和术后需要对残疾情况进行结构化评估。患者症状的主观方面应作为该评估的一部分,最好通过患者报告结局量表(PROMs)来获取。有几种PROMs,包括通用问卷或特定区域问卷,但在足踝评估方面没有“金标准”。我们翻译了自我报告的足踝评分(SEFAS),并从可靠性、有效性和反应性方面评估了该评分在各种足踝疾病患者中的心理测量特性。在本报告中,我们推荐了一种PROMs的验证过程,并报告称SEFAS在进行验证时显示出良好的结果。由于SEFAS是一种PROM,该工具似乎适合用于国家登记册。