Department of Ecosystem Management, School of Environment and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity & Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;534:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
生物的存在和运动既反映又影响生态资源在时空上的分布。通过遥测设备对动物运动的监测正越来越多地被用于为海洋、淡水和陆地生态系统的管理提供信息。在这里,我们汇集了学者和环境管理者,以确定澳大利亚地区动物运动研究的范围,并评估共享和重用这些数据的机会和挑战。该工作组是在澳大利亚生态分析与综合中心(ACEAS)的组织下成立的,其总体目标是促进跨组织和跨学科的综合研究。我们发现,在 2000 年至 2012 年期间,至少有 501 篇经过同行评审的科学论文发表,这些论文报告了在澳大利亚地区内使用遥测设备收集的动物位置数据。这些数据总共涉及对 12656 只动物的捕获和电子标记。大多数研究都是为了解决具体的管理问题;很少有数据超出其最初的用途。我们估计,大约有一半(约 500)的动物遥测项目仍未发表,同样比例的项目无法通过在线资源发现,只有不到 8.8%被标记和跟踪的动物将其数据以可发现和可访问的方式存储。动物遥测数据包含了大量关于动物和物种如何相互作用以及它们如何与所栖息的景观相互作用的信息。这些数据收集成本高、难度大,并且会降低被标记个体的存活率,这意味着有责任向科学界提供这些数据。这是第一项量化动物身上放置的遥测设备与发表的发现/数据之间差距的研究,并提出了改进的方法。实施这些策略将提高研究的成本效益,并最大限度地提高其对自然资源管理的影响。