Suppr超能文献

第二代抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的疗效和耐受性的同时比较:基于头对头试验数据的混合治疗比较分析。

Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Eulji University School of Medicine, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Eulji University School of Medicine, Eulji General Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jan;12(1):46-54. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.1.46. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Second-generation antipsychotics have been repeatedly shown to be superior to placebo. However, the comparative efficacy among these drugs has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we used Mixed Treatment Comparison (MTC) procedures to elucidate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics.

METHODS

Seven antipsychotics were selected based on the availability of the relevant data. Data were gathered from a series of review article published by the Cochrane Collaboration. Six outcome measures were analyzed: 1) percentage of no clinically important response as defined by the original authors, 2) PANSS total score change from baseline to endpoint, 3) percentage of akathisia, 4) percentage of antiparkinson medication use, 5) percentage of total body weight increase more than 7%, and 6) percentage of drop-out due to any reasons.

RESULTS

All the second-generation antipsychotics included in this study showed fairly similar efficacy but widely different tolerability. In terms of efficacy, amisulpride, clozapine and olanzapine were ranked higher than aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Clozapine and olanzapine were superior in terms of akathisia and extrapyramidal symptom risk, but, far more prone to induce clinically important weight gain.

CONCLUSION

Using MTC methodology, we could line up the second generation antipsychotics according to their hierarchical superiority in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Though the wide overlap among the confidence intervals and the inconsistency between the direct and indirect comparison results may limit the validity of these results, it may still allow the important insights into the relative merits of the available drugs.

摘要

目的

第二代抗精神病药已被反复证明优于安慰剂。然而,这些药物之间的相对疗效尚未得到系统评价。在这项研究中,我们使用混合治疗比较(MTC)程序来阐明第二代抗精神病药的相对疗效和耐受性。

方法

根据相关数据的可用性,选择了七种抗精神病药。数据来自 Cochrane 协作组织发表的一系列综述文章。分析了六个结局指标:1)原始作者定义的无临床重要反应的百分比,2)从基线到终点的 PANSS 总分变化,3)静坐不能的百分比,4)抗帕金森药物使用的百分比,5)体重增加超过 7%的百分比,以及 6)因任何原因退出的百分比。

结果

本研究纳入的所有第二代抗精神病药均显示出相当相似的疗效,但耐受性差异很大。在疗效方面,氨磺必利、氯氮平和奥氮平的排名高于阿立哌唑、喹硫平和齐拉西酮。氯氮平和奥氮平在静坐不能和锥体外系症状风险方面更具优势,但更易引起临床重要的体重增加。

结论

使用 MTC 方法,我们可以根据疗效和耐受性的层次优势对第二代抗精神病药进行排序。尽管置信区间的广泛重叠以及直接比较和间接比较结果之间的不一致可能限制了这些结果的有效性,但它仍可能为了解现有药物的相对优点提供重要的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验