Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍检查表对爆炸暴露军人的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist in blast-exposed military personnel.

作者信息

Walker William C, McDonald Scott D, Franke Laura Manning

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;

出版信息

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(8):1203-16. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.12.0271.

Abstract

Researchers often extrapolate posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) status from PTSD Checklist (PCL) data. When doing so, cut points should be based on samples with similar characteristics. This study assessed PCL diagnostic accuracy and postconcussive symptom levels within 106 Iraq/Afghanistan war Veterans and servicemembers with recent blast exposure. Two definitions of PTSD were applied: (1) "strict" Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders (DSM), 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria and (2) "relaxed" DSM-IV criteria dropping the A2 criterion as per the DSM, 5th edition (DSM-V). Using a structured interview for PTSD, we found moderate agreement with the PCL. Under strict criteria, PTSD prevalence was 16%, PCL cut point was 66 at peak kappa, and mean Rivermead Postconcussion Questionnaire (RPQ) score trended higher for those with PTSD than for those without PTSD (35.5 +/- 11.2 vs 30.5 +/- 10.7, respectively; p = 0.080). Under relaxed criteria, PTSD prevalence was 26.4%, PCL cut point was 58 at peak kappa, and those with PTSD had higher RPQ scores than those without PTSD (36.4 +/- 11.2 vs 29.5 +/- 10.2, respectively; p = 0.003). Participants diagnosed with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (n = 90) did not differ from those without mild traumatic brain injury (n = 16) in symptom scores. In conclusion, persons with combat-related blast exposure need higher than conventional PCL cut points and those with PTSD have more severe postconcussive-type symptoms than those without PTSD.

摘要

研究人员常常根据创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL)的数据来推断创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的状况。在这样做时,切点应基于具有相似特征的样本。本研究评估了106名近期遭受爆炸冲击的伊拉克/阿富汗战争退伍军人和现役军人的PCL诊断准确性和脑震荡后症状水平。应用了两种PTSD定义:(1)“严格的”《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)第四版(DSM-IV)标准;(2)根据DSM第五版(DSM-V)放弃A2标准的“宽松的”DSM-IV标准。通过对PTSD进行结构化访谈,我们发现与PCL有中度一致性。在严格标准下,PTSD患病率为16%,PCL切点在kappa峰值时为66,且PTSD患者的平均Rivermead脑震荡后问卷(RPQ)得分比无PTSD患者的得分有升高趋势(分别为35.5±11.2和30.5±10.7;p = 0.080)。在宽松标准下,PTSD患病率为26.4%,PCL切点在kappa峰值时为58,且PTSD患者的RPQ得分高于无PTSD患者(分别为36.4±11.2和29.5±10.2;p = 0.003)。被诊断为爆炸相关轻度创伤性脑损伤的参与者(n = 90)与无轻度创伤性脑损伤的参与者(n = 16)在症状评分上没有差异。总之,与战斗相关的爆炸暴露者需要高于传统PCL切点的值,且PTSD患者比无PTSD患者有更严重的脑震荡后类型症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验