Kim Chang W, Chang Jae H, Kim Tae H, Han Sok W
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):18-24. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.151212.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The double-guidewire technique (DGT) and transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) are introduced as alternative biliary cannulation techniques for difficult biliary cannulation. This study aimed to evaluate the sequential use of DGT and TPS compared with a needle-knife precut papillotomy (NK).
Six hundred and thirty-five consecutive patients with naοve papilla and who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary cannulation from March 2010 to April 2014 in a single institute were analyzed. When standard techniques were unsuccessful, DGT or NK was performed. TPS was sequentially performed if DGT failed.
DGT and NK were attempted in 65 and 58 patients, respectively. A sequential DGT-TPS was performed in 38 patients after a failed DGT. Biliary cannulations were successful in 42%, 74%, and 66% of the DGT, sequential DGT-TPS, and NK patients, respectively (P = 0.002). The cannulation rate was higher in the DGT ± TPS patients (85%) than in the NK patients (P = 0.014). Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) developed in 26% of the successful DGT patients, 37% of the sequential DGT-TPS patients, and 10% of the NK patients (P = 0.008). Of the sequential DGT-TPS patients, the incidence of PEP was significantly reduced in patients with a pancreatic duct (PD) stent compared with patients without a PD stent (24% vs. 62%, P = 0.023).
Sequential DGT-TPS is a useful alternative method compared with NK for patients in whom biliary cannulation is difficult. In the sequential DGT-TPS patients, the incidence of PEP was significantly reduced with the use of a PD stent.
背景/目的:双导丝技术(DGT)和经胰预切开括约肌切开术(TPS)被引入作为困难胆管插管的替代胆管插管技术。本研究旨在评估DGT和TPS序贯使用与针刀乳头预切开术(NK)相比的效果。
分析了2010年3月至2014年4月在一家机构连续接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)进行胆管插管的635例初诊乳头患者。当标准技术失败时,进行DGT或NK。如果DGT失败,则序贯进行TPS。
分别对65例和58例患者尝试了DGT和NK。38例DGT失败的患者进行了序贯DGT-TPS。DGT、序贯DGT-TPS和NK患者的胆管插管成功率分别为42%、74%和66%(P = 0.002)。DGT ± TPS患者的插管率(85%)高于NK患者(P = 0.014)。成功的DGT患者中有26%发生了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎(PEP),序贯DGT-TPS患者中有37%,NK患者中有10%(P = 0.008)。在序贯DGT-TPS患者中,与未放置胰管(PD)支架的患者相比,放置PD支架的患者PEP发生率显著降低(24%对62%,P = 0.023)。
对于胆管插管困难的患者,序贯DGT-TPS与NK相比是一种有用的替代方法。在序贯DGT-TPS患者中,使用PD支架可显著降低PEP的发生率。