Halttunen Jorma, Keränen Ilona, Udd Marianne, Kylänpää Leena
Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):745-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0056-0. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
In endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for complications.
Altogether 6,209 ERCPs were performed in Helsinki University Central Hospital in the period 1996-2006. In 558 cases (9%) without a previous sphincterotomy, direct access into the biliary duct could not be achieved. In this group access was attempted by first performing a pancreatic sphincterotomy in 351 difficult cannulation cases (63%). A needle knife precut without a pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed in 178 cases (32%). All the necessary clinical and laboratory information was available for 262 of the 351 patients who had undergone a pancreatic sphincterotomy and for 157 of the 178 patients who had been subjected to needle knife precutting, and these data were further evaluated in this study.
The pancreatic sphincterotomy technique was successful in 255 cases (97.3%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 8.8% of the pancreatic sphincterotomy group. In 147 patients, biliary cannulation was successful following a pancreatic sphincterotomy, and the post-ERCP pancreatitis rate for those patients was 9.3%. In 108 patients, a needle knife papillotomy, in addition to a pancreatic sphincterotomy, was necessary and resulted in a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 8.2%. In the needle knife precut group only, post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 5.1% of cases. Biliary cannulation succeeded less frequently following needle knife precutting than following the pancreatic sphincterotomy technique (71.3% versus 97.3%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the post-ERCP pancreatitis rate between the precut and pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques (p=0.16).
In difficult cannulation, a pancreatic sphincterotomy to achieve deep biliary duct cannulation can be performed with a high success rate (failure rate less than 3%). The corresponding success rate using the needle knife precut technique is 71%. In both methods the risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis is comparable to that of a standard biliary sphincterotomy.
在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中,插管困难是并发症的独立危险因素。
1996年至2006年期间,赫尔辛基大学中心医院共进行了6209例ERCP。在558例(9%)未行括约肌切开术的患者中,无法直接进入胆管。在这组患者中,351例(63%)插管困难的病例首先尝试进行胰括约肌切开术以实现胆管插管。178例(32%)患者在未行胰括约肌切开术的情况下进行了针刀预切开。对351例接受胰括约肌切开术的患者中的262例以及178例接受针刀预切开的患者中的157例,所有必要的临床和实验室信息均可用,本研究对这些数据进行了进一步评估。
胰括约肌切开术成功255例(97.3%)。胰括约肌切开术组发生ERCP后胰腺炎的比例为8.8%。147例患者在胰括约肌切开术后胆管插管成功,这些患者的ERCP后胰腺炎发生率为9.3%。108例患者除了进行胰括约肌切开术外,还需要进行针刀乳头切开术,其ERCP后胰腺炎发生率为8.2%。仅在针刀预切开组中,5.1%的病例发生了ERCP后胰腺炎。针刀预切开术后胆管插管成功的频率低于胰括约肌切开术(71.3%对97.3%,p<0.001)。预切开术和胰括约肌切开术之间的ERCP后胰腺炎发生率无显著差异(p=0.16)。
在插管困难时,进行胰括约肌切开术以实现胆管深部插管的成功率较高(失败率低于3%)。使用针刀预切开技术的相应成功率为71%。两种方法中ERCP后胰腺炎的风险与标准胆管括约肌切开术相当。