Montero-López Eva, Santos-Ruiz Ana, García-Ríos M Carmen, Rodríguez-Blázquez Raúl, Pérez-García Miguel, Peralta-Ramírez María Isabel
Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):223-32. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0565-4.
Virtual reality adaptations of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST-VR) constitute useful tools for studying the physiologic axes involved in the stress response. Here, we aimed to determine the most appropriate experimental approach to the TSST-VR when investigating the modulation of the axes involved in the stress response. We compared the use of goggles versus a screen projection in the TSST-VR paradigm. Forty-five healthy participants were divided into two groups: the first one (goggles condition; 13 females, 11 males) wore goggles while performing the TSST-VR; the second (screen condition; 15 females, six males) was exposed to the TSST-VR projected on a screen. Sympathetic reactivity to stress was measured by continuously recording skin conductance (SC), while the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) was evaluated by sampling salivary cortisol throughout the experiment. At the end of the task, there was an increase in SC and cortisol level for both means of delivering the TSST-VR, although the increase in SC was greater in the goggles condition, while salivary cortisol was comparable in both groups. Immersion levels were reportedly higher in the screen presentation than in the goggles group. In terms of sex differences, females experienced greater involvement and spatial presence, though comparatively less experienced realism, than their male counterparts. These findings help us determine which protocol of the TSST-VR is most suitable for the stress response under study. They also emphasize the need to consider the sex of participants, as males and females show distinct responses in each protocol.
特里尔社会应激测试的虚拟现实改编版(TSST-VR)是研究应激反应中涉及的生理轴的有用工具。在此,我们旨在确定在研究应激反应中涉及的轴的调节时,最适合TSST-VR的实验方法。我们比较了在TSST-VR范式中使用护目镜与屏幕投影的情况。45名健康参与者被分为两组:第一组(护目镜组;13名女性,11名男性)在进行TSST-VR时佩戴护目镜;第二组(屏幕组;15名女性,6名男性)观看投影在屏幕上的TSST-VR。通过连续记录皮肤电导率(SC)来测量对压力的交感神经反应性,同时在整个实验过程中通过采集唾液皮质醇来评估下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴(HPA)。在任务结束时,两种呈现TSST-VR的方式下SC和皮质醇水平均有所升高,尽管在护目镜组中SC的升高幅度更大,而两组的唾液皮质醇水平相当。据报道,屏幕呈现的沉浸程度高于护目镜组。在性别差异方面,女性比男性参与度更高、空间存在感更强,不过在真实感体验上相对较弱。这些发现有助于我们确定TSST-VR的哪种方案最适合所研究的应激反应。它们还强调了考虑参与者性别的必要性,因为男性和女性在每种方案中表现出不同的反应。