Romley John A, Goldman Dana P, Sood Neeraj
John A. Romley (
Dana P. Goldman is the Leonard D. Schaeffer Director's Chair and director of the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, and a professor of public policy, pharmacy, and economics in the School of Pharmacy, Sol Price School of Public Policy, and Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, all at the University of Southern California.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):511-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0587. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
The need for better value in US health care is widely recognized. Existing evidence suggests that improvement in the productivity of American hospitals-that is, the output that hospitals produce from inputs such as labor and capital-has lagged behind that of other industries. However, previous studies have not adequately addressed quality of care or severity of patient illness. Our study, by contrast, adjusts for trends in the severity of patients' conditions and health outcomes. We studied productivity growth among US hospitals in treating Medicare patients with heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia during 2002-11. We found that the rates of annual productivity growth were 0.78 percent for heart attack, 0.62 percent for heart failure, and 1.90 percent for pneumonia. However, unadjusted productivity growth appears to have been negative. These findings suggest that productivity growth in US health care could be better than is sometimes believed, and may help alleviate concerns about Medicare payment policy under the Affordable Care Act.
美国医疗保健领域对更高价值的需求已得到广泛认可。现有证据表明,美国医院生产率的提高——即医院利用劳动力和资本等投入所产生的产出——落后于其他行业。然而,以往的研究并未充分考虑医疗质量或患者病情的严重程度。相比之下,我们的研究对患者病情严重程度和健康结果的趋势进行了调整。我们研究了2002年至2011年期间美国医院治疗心脏病发作、心力衰竭和肺炎的医疗保险患者的生产率增长情况。我们发现,心脏病发作的年生产率增长率为0.78%,心力衰竭为0.62%,肺炎为1.90%。然而,未经调整的生产率增长似乎为负。这些发现表明,美国医疗保健领域的生产率增长可能比人们有时认为的要好,并且可能有助于缓解对《平价医疗法案》下医疗保险支付政策的担忧。