Feo Teresa J, Field Daniel J, Prum Richard O
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142864. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2864.
The geometry of feather barbs (barb length and barb angle) determines feather vane asymmetry and vane rigidity, which are both critical to a feather's aerodynamic performance. Here, we describe the relationship between barb geometry and aerodynamic function across the evolutionary history of asymmetrical flight feathers, from Mesozoic taxa outside of modern avian diversity (Microraptor, Archaeopteryx, Sapeornis, Confuciusornis and the enantiornithine Eopengornis) to an extensive sample of modern birds. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that barb angle is not related to vane-width asymmetry; instead barb angle varies with vane function, whereas barb length variation determines vane asymmetry. We demonstrate that barb geometry significantly differs among functionally distinct portions of flight feather vanes, and that cutting-edge leading vanes occupy a distinct region of morphospace characterized by small barb angles. This cutting-edge vane morphology is ubiquitous across a phylogenetically and functionally diverse sample of modern birds and Mesozoic stem birds, revealing a fundamental aerodynamic adaptation that has persisted from the Late Jurassic. However, in Mesozoic taxa stemward of Ornithurae and Enantiornithes, trailing vane barb geometry is distinctly different from that of modern birds. In both modern birds and enantiornithines, trailing vanes have larger barb angles than in comparatively stemward taxa like Archaeopteryx, which exhibit small trailing vane barb angles. This discovery reveals a previously unrecognized evolutionary transition in flight feather morphology, which has important implications for the flight capacity of early feathered theropods such as Archaeopteryx and Microraptor. Our findings suggest that the fully modern avian flight feather, and possibly a modern capacity for powered flight, evolved crownward of Confuciusornis, long after the origin of asymmetrical flight feathers, and much later than previously recognized.
羽枝(羽枝长度和羽枝角度)的几何形状决定了羽毛羽片的不对称性和羽片刚度,这两者对羽毛的空气动力学性能都至关重要。在这里,我们描述了从现代鸟类多样性之外的中生代类群(小盗龙、始祖鸟、孔子鸟、热河鸟和反鸟亚纲的始鹏鸟)到大量现代鸟类样本的不对称飞羽进化历史中羽枝几何形状与空气动力学功能之间的关系。与之前的假设相反,我们发现羽枝角度与羽片宽度不对称无关;相反,羽枝角度随羽片功能而变化,而羽枝长度变化决定羽片不对称性。我们证明,飞行羽毛羽片功能不同的部分之间羽枝几何形状存在显著差异,前沿的主羽片占据形态空间的一个独特区域,其特征是羽枝角度较小。这种前沿羽片形态在现代鸟类和中生代基干鸟类的系统发育和功能多样的样本中普遍存在,揭示了一种从晚侏罗世就一直存在的基本空气动力学适应性。然而,在鸟胸骨类和反鸟亚纲的中生代类群中,尾羽羽枝几何形状与现代鸟类明显不同。在现代鸟类和反鸟亚纲中,尾羽的羽枝角度都比始祖鸟等相对基干类群的要大,始祖鸟的尾羽羽枝角度较小。这一发现揭示了飞行羽毛形态学中一个以前未被认识到的进化转变,这对始祖鸟和小盗龙等早期有羽毛兽脚类恐龙的飞行能力具有重要意义。我们的研究结果表明,完全现代的鸟类飞行羽毛,以及可能的现代动力飞行能力,是在不对称飞羽起源很久之后,在孔子鸟之上进化而来的,比之前认为的要晚得多。