Aman Joshua E, Elangovan Naveen, Yeh I-Ling, Konczak Jürgen
Human Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA ; Center for Clinical Movement Science, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Human Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;8:1075. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01075. eCollection 2014.
Numerous reports advocate that training of the proprioceptive sense is a viable behavioral therapy for improving impaired motor function. However, there is little agreement of what constitutes proprioceptive training and how effective it is. We therefore conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the available literature in order to provide clarity to the notion of training the proprioceptive system.
Four major scientific databases were searched. The following criteria were subsequently applied: (1) A quantified pre- and post-treatment measure of proprioceptive function. (2) An intervention or training program believed to influence or enhance proprioceptive function. (3) Contained at least one form of treatment or outcome measure that is indicative of somatosensory function. From a total of 1284 articles, 51 studies fulfilled all criteria and were selected for further review.
Overall, proprioceptive training resulted in an average improvement of 52% across all outcome measures. Applying muscle vibration above 30 Hz for longer durations (i.e., min vs. s) induced outcome improvements of up to 60%. Joint position and target reaching training consistently enhanced joint position sense (up to 109%) showing an average improvement of 48%. Cortical stroke was the most studied disease entity but no clear evidence indicated that proprioceptive training is differentially beneficial across the reported diseases.
There is converging evidence that proprioceptive training can yield meaningful improvements in somatosensory and sensorimotor function. However, there is a clear need for further work. Those forms of training utilizing both passive and active movements with and without visual feedback tended to be most beneficial. There is also initial evidence suggesting that proprioceptive training induces cortical reorganization, reinforcing the notion that proprioceptive training is a viable method for improving sensorimotor function.
众多报告主张,本体感觉训练是改善运动功能受损的一种可行的行为疗法。然而,对于什么构成本体感觉训练以及其效果如何,几乎没有一致的看法。因此,我们对现有文献进行了全面、系统的综述,以明确训练本体感觉系统这一概念。
检索了四个主要科学数据库。随后应用了以下标准:(1)本体感觉功能治疗前后的量化测量。(2)一种被认为会影响或增强本体感觉功能的干预或训练方案。(3)包含至少一种表明躯体感觉功能的治疗或结果测量形式。在总共1284篇文章中,有51项研究符合所有标准并被选作进一步综述。
总体而言,本体感觉训练在所有结果测量中平均改善了52%。长时间(即分钟与秒相比)应用频率高于30Hz的肌肉振动可使结果改善高达60%。关节位置和目标到达训练持续增强关节位置感(高达109%),平均改善48%。皮质中风是研究最多的疾病实体,但没有明确证据表明本体感觉训练在已报道的疾病中具有不同的益处。
有越来越多的证据表明,本体感觉训练可在躯体感觉和感觉运动功能方面产生有意义的改善。然而,显然需要进一步开展工作。那些利用有或无视觉反馈的被动和主动运动的训练形式往往最有益。也有初步证据表明本体感觉训练会引起皮质重组,强化了本体感觉训练是改善感觉运动功能的一种可行方法这一观点。