Suppr超能文献

腰椎管中央狭窄症患者腰椎间孔硬膜外注射的随机双盲对照试验:2年随访

A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: 2-year follow-up.

作者信息

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Cash Kimberly A, McManus Carla D, Damron Kim S, Pampati Vidyasagar, Falco Frank J E

机构信息

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, and Mid Atlantic Spine & Pain Physicians of Newark, Newark, DE.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):79-92.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While low back pain is the number one cause of disability in the United States, lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation and degenerative spondylolisthesis is one of the 3 most common diagnosis of low back and leg pain for which surgery is performed. Numerous modalities of treatments including drug therapy and complex surgical fusions have been recommended for treatment of central spinal stenosis. Epidural injections are one of the commonly performed nonsurgical interventions in managing central spinal stenosis; however, there has been paucity of literature in reference to efficacy of epidural injections in managing central spinal stenosis with lumbar interlaminar epidural injections.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, active controlled trial.

SETTING

Private interventional pain management practice and specialty referral center in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections with or without steroids in providing effective and long-lasting pain relief with improvement in functional status for the management of chronic low back and lower extremity pain related to lumbar central spinal stenosis.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, active-control trial was designed with the inclusion of 120 patients assigned to 2 groups. Group I patients received lumbar interlaminar epidural injections of local anesthetic (lidocaine 0.5%) 6 mL, whereas Group II received lumbar interlaminar epidural injections with local anesthetic (lidocaine 0.5%) 5 mL mixed with 1 mL of steroids and 6 mg of betamethasone.

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT

Outcomes were assessed utilizing the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment. The primary outcome measure was significant improvement, defined as 50% improvement in pain and disability scores.

RESULTS

Significant relief and functional status improvement was seen in 72% and 73% of patients in Groups I and II at the end of 2 years considering all participants; however, this was 84% and 85% in the successful group. Overall significant improvement was achieved for 65.7 ± 37.3 weeks in Group 1 and 68.9 ± 37.7 weeks in Group II at the end of 2 years when all participants were considered; whereas, this was 77 ± 27.8 weeks and 77.9 ± 30.2 weeks when they were separated into successful categories. The average number of procedures per patient was 5 to 6 in both groups.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this trial include lack of placebo control group and treatment of patients with multiple procedures over a period of 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar interlaminar epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids provide relief in a significant proportion of patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL

NCT00681447.

摘要

背景

虽然腰痛是美国导致残疾的首要原因,但腰椎管狭窄症与椎间盘突出症和退行性椎体滑脱症是导致腰腿痛且需进行手术治疗的3种最常见诊断之一。针对中央型椎管狭窄症的治疗,已推荐了多种治疗方式,包括药物治疗和复杂的手术融合术。硬膜外注射是治疗中央型椎管狭窄症常用的非手术干预措施之一;然而,关于经腰椎间隙硬膜外注射进行硬膜外注射治疗中央型椎管狭窄症疗效的文献较少。

研究设计

一项随机、双盲、活性对照试验。

研究地点

美国一家私立介入性疼痛管理诊所及专科转诊中心。

目的

评估经腰椎间隙硬膜外注射含或不含类固醇药物,在缓解慢性腰腿痛(与腰椎中央型椎管狭窄症相关)方面能否有效且持久地减轻疼痛,并改善功能状态。

方法

设计了一项随机、双盲、活性对照试验,纳入120例患者并分为2组。第一组患者接受6毫升局部麻醉剂(0.5%利多卡因)的腰椎间隙硬膜外注射,而第二组患者接受5毫升局部麻醉剂(0.5%利多卡因)与1毫升类固醇药物及6毫克倍他米松混合后的腰椎间隙硬膜外注射。

疗效评估

在治疗后3、6、12、18和24个月,使用数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)和奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)对疗效进行评估。主要疗效指标为显著改善,定义为疼痛和功能障碍评分改善50%。

结果

考虑所有参与者,在2年结束时,第一组和第二组分别有72%和73%的患者疼痛得到显著缓解且功能状态得到改善;然而,在成功组中这一比例分别为84%和85%。考虑所有参与者时,在2年结束时,第一组总体显著改善持续了65.7±37.3周,第二组为68.9±37.7周;而当将患者分为成功类别时,第一组为77±27.8周,第二组为77.9±30.2周。两组中每位患者的平均治疗次数均为5至6次。

局限性

本试验的局限性包括缺乏安慰剂对照组,以及在2年期间对患者进行多次治疗。

结论

经腰椎间隙硬膜外注射含或不含类固醇药物的局部麻醉剂,能使相当比例的腰椎中央型椎管狭窄症患者病情得到缓解。

临床试验

NCT00681447

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验