文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with the free combination of once-daily tiotropium plus twice-daily formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (QUANTIFY): a randomised, non-inferiority study.

作者信息

Buhl Roland, Gessner Christian, Schuermann Wolfgang, Foerster Karin, Sieder Christian, Hiltl Simone, Korn Stephanie

机构信息

III.Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz K.d.ö.R., Mainz, Germany.

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany POIS Leipzig GbR, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Thorax. 2015 Apr;70(4):311-9. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206345. Epub 2015 Feb 12.


DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206345
PMID:25677679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4392202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: QVA149 is a once-daily (o.d.) inhaled dual bronchodilator containing a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium for the treatment of COPD. The QUANTIFY study compared QVA149 with a free-dose bronchodilator combination of tiotropium plus formoterol (TIO+FOR) in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with COPD. METHODS: This multicentre, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study randomised patients aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥30% to <80% predicted) to QVA149 110/50 µg o.d. or TIO 18 µg o.d.+ FOR 12 µg twice daily (1:1) for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate non-inferiority in HRQoL assessed using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C). The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 4 units. Secondary endpoints included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) score, pre-dose FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC) and safety. RESULTS: Of the 934 patients randomised (QVA149=476 and TIO+FOR=458), 87.9% completed the study. At week 26, non-inferiority was met for SGRQ-C (QVA149 vs TIO+FOR; difference: -0.69 units; 95% CI -2.31 to 0.92; p=0.399). A significantly higher percentage of patients achieved a clinically relevant ≥1 point improvement in TDI total score with QVA149 (49.6%) versus TIO+FOR (42.4%; p=0.033). QVA149 significantly increased pre-dose FEV1 (+68 mL, 95% CI 37 mL to 100 mL; p<0.001) and FVC (+74 mL, 95% CI 24 mL to 125 mL; p=0.004) compared with TIO+FOR at week 26. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between both treatments (QVA149=43.7% and TIO+FOR=42.6%). CONCLUSIONS: QVA149 is non-inferior to TIO+FOR in improving HRQoL, with clinically meaningful and significant improvements in breathlessness and lung function in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01120717.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/a8c9a89d7c1c/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/1fe183c90202/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/42e397737695/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/b8970d12db52/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/465a360818da/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/b23d191faff6/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/a8c9a89d7c1c/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/1fe183c90202/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/42e397737695/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/b8970d12db52/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/465a360818da/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/b23d191faff6/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1511/4392202/a8c9a89d7c1c/thoraxjnl-2014-206345f06.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with the free combination of once-daily tiotropium plus twice-daily formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (QUANTIFY): a randomised, non-inferiority study.

Thorax. 2015-4

[2]
LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015-6-5

[3]
Effect of QVA149 on lung volumes and exercise tolerance in COPD patients: the BRIGHT study.

Respir Med. 2014-4

[4]
Safety and efficacy of dual bronchodilation with QVA149 in COPD patients: the ENLIGHTEN study.

Respir Med. 2013-7-16

[5]
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2012-12-6

[6]
Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013-10-17

[7]
Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the dual bronchodilator QVA149 compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium (SPARK): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2013-4-23

[8]
Dual Bronchodilator Therapy with Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium plus Indacaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Drugs R D. 2016-6

[9]
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-22

[10]
Efficacy of a new once-daily long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist indacaterol versus twice-daily formoterol in COPD.

Thorax. 2010-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
LABA/LAMA versus LABA/ICS fixed-dose combinations in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a modeling analysis of literature aggregate data.

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023-10

[2]
Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Adv Ther. 2022-11

[3]
Quantitative analysis of efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of stable COPD.

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022

[4]
What conservative interventions can improve the long-term quality of life, depression, and anxiety of individuals with stable COPD? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qual Life Res. 2022-4

[5]
INTREPID: single- multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice.

ERJ Open Res. 2021-6-7

[6]
Direct Switch from Tiotropium to Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Korea.

Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2021-4

[7]
Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Respir Res. 2020-11-25

[8]
Early Clinically Important Improvement (ECII) and Exacerbation Outcomes in COPD Patients.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020

[9]
A Network Meta-Analysis of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA) and Long-Acting β-Agonist (LABA) Combinations in COPD.

Pulm Ther. 2017-12

[10]
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler in comparison with other long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combinations in COPD.

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019

本文引用的文献

[1]
Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the dual bronchodilator QVA149 compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium (SPARK): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2013-4-23

[2]
Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014-2-1

[3]
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2012-12-6

[4]
Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 reduces patient-reported dyspnoea in COPD: the BLAZE study.

Eur Respir J. 2013-10-31

[5]
Characterisation of exacerbation risk and exacerbator phenotypes in the POET-COPD trial.

Respir Res. 2013-10-29

[6]
Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013-10-17

[7]
Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-10-15

[8]
Safety and efficacy of dual bronchodilation with QVA149 in COPD patients: the ENLIGHTEN study.

Respir Med. 2013-7-16

[9]
Efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg in COPD.

Respir Med. 2013-7-2

[10]
Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchodilator therapy: the SHINE study.

Eur Respir J. 2013-5-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索