Fournier Anne, Eggimann Philippe, Pagani Jean-Luc, Revelly Jean-Pierre, Decosterd Laurent A, Marchetti Oscar, Pannatier André, Voirol Pierre, Que Yok-Ai
Service of Pharmacy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Service of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Burns. 2015 Aug;41(5):956-68. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Adequate empirical antibiotic dose selection for critically ill burn patients is difficult due to extreme variability in drug pharmacokinetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may aid antibiotic prescription and implementation of initial empirical antimicrobial dosage recommendations. This study evaluated how gradual TDM introduction altered empirical dosages of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin in our burn ICU.
Imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem use and daily empirical dosage at a five-bed burn ICU were analyzed retrospectively. Data for all burn admissions between 2001 and 2011 were extracted from the hospital's computerized information system. For each patient receiving a carbapenem, episodes of infection were reviewed and scored according to predefined criteria. Carbapenem trough serum levels were characterized. Prior to May 2007, TDM was available only by special request. Real-time carbapenem TDM was introduced in June 2007; it was initially available weekly and has been available 4 days a week since 2010.
Of 365 patients, 229 (63%) received antibiotics (109 received carbapenems). Of 23 TDM determinations for imipenem/cilastatin, none exceeded the predefined upper limit and 11 (47.8%) were insufficient; the number of TDM requests was correlated with daily dose (r=0.7). Similar numbers of inappropriate meropenem trough levels (30.4%) were below and above the upper limit. Real-time TDM introduction increased the empirical dose of imipenem/cilastatin, but not meropenem.
Real-time carbapenem TDM availability significantly altered the empirical daily dosage of imipenem/cilastatin at our burn ICU. Further studies are needed to evaluate the individual impact of TDM-based antibiotic adjustment on infection outcomes in these patients.
由于药物药代动力学存在极大变异性,为重症烧伤患者选择合适的经验性抗生素剂量十分困难。治疗药物监测(TDM)可能有助于抗生素处方及初始经验性抗菌药物剂量推荐的实施。本研究评估了逐步引入TDM如何改变我们烧伤重症监护病房(ICU)中美罗培南和亚胺培南/西司他丁的经验性剂量。
回顾性分析了一家五床位烧伤ICU中使用亚胺培南/西司他丁和美罗培南的情况以及每日经验性剂量。从医院的计算机信息系统中提取了2001年至2011年间所有烧伤入院患者的数据。对于每一位接受碳青霉烯类药物治疗的患者,根据预定义标准对感染发作情况进行审查和评分。对碳青霉烯类药物的谷浓度血清水平进行了特征分析。在2007年5月之前,TDM仅可通过特殊申请获得。2007年6月引入了实时碳青霉烯类药物TDM;最初每周提供一次,自2010年起每周提供四天。
在365例患者中,229例(63%)接受了抗生素治疗(109例接受了碳青霉烯类药物)。在对亚胺培南/西司他丁进行的23次TDM测定中,没有一次超过预定义的上限,11次(47.8%)不足;TDM申请次数与每日剂量相关(r = 0.7)。美罗培南谷浓度水平不合适的情况中,低于和高于上限的数量相似(30.4%)。引入实时TDM增加了亚胺培南/西司他丁的经验性剂量,但未增加美罗培南的剂量。
在我们的烧伤ICU中,实时碳青霉烯类药物TDM的可用性显著改变了亚胺培南/西司他丁的每日经验性剂量。需要进一步研究来评估基于TDM的抗生素调整对这些患者感染结局的个体影响。