• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5岁以下儿童骨锚式助听器植入经验。

Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age.

作者信息

Amonoo-Kuofi Kwamena, Kelly Andrea, Neeff Michel, Brown Colin R S

机构信息

Starship Children's Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1024, New Zealand.

Starship Children's Hospital, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.033. Epub 2015 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.033
PMID:25680294
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the practicality and benefit of Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA(®)) implantation in children younger than 5 years of age. FDA approval for use of BAHA(®) only exists for children 5 years of age and older. Their use in Australia is also rare, however their use for younger children is approved by the European Union. We wish to share our experience of implantation in an antipodean setting in this age group.

METHODS

Institutional board approval was obtained for this study. All children undergoing BAHA(®) implantation under 5 years old were included from our prospective database. We examined the variety of surgical techniques, (including skin grafting, limited soft tissue reduction and no soft tissue reduction), BAHA(®) implants and abutments used, and use of the new series 400 hydroxyapatite coatings. Demographic data obtained included age at surgery, follow up duration, gender, ethnicity and indication for surgery. Anonymous benefit questionnaires (Glasgow children's benefit inventory (GCBI) and parents' evaluation of aural performance of children (PEACH)) were completed online as well as a questionnaire on device use. Complications recorded included soft tissue reactions, implant loss/removal, abutment replacement/removal. We also assessed whether patient weight, ethnicity or socioeconomic status were risk factors for these complications.

RESULTS

24 Children (26 ears/26 implants) under five years were identified from the database and included in the study. There was a 14:10 male to female ratio. Patient caregivers reported subjective benefit and improved quality of life (QOL) despite setbacks and complications related to BAHA(®) usage. 10/24 (42%) of children required treatment for significant peri-implant skin reactions whilst 25% required replacement of their abutments and/or implants. An increased risk of major complication was associated with socioeconomic deprived backgrounds and in patients of New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island ethnicity but not in patients with increased weight centiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The BAHA(®) implant and hearing aid system is of value to children under age 5 years. Parents tolerate the skin reactions and complications because of the perceived benefit in hearing and quality of life. Careful counselling of parents of potential young BAHA(®) implant candidates is necessary in light of this.

摘要

目的

评估骨锚式助听器(BAHA(®))植入5岁以下儿童的实用性和益处。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)仅批准5岁及以上儿童使用BAHA(®)。在澳大利亚,其使用也很少见,不过欧盟批准将其用于年幼儿童。我们希望分享在这个年龄组的 antipodean 环境中进行植入的经验。

方法

本研究获得了机构委员会的批准。我们前瞻性数据库中纳入了所有5岁以下接受BAHA(®)植入的儿童。我们检查了各种手术技术(包括植皮、有限的软组织复位和无软组织复位)、使用的BAHA(®)植入体和基台,以及新系列400羟基磷灰石涂层的使用情况。获得的人口统计学数据包括手术年龄、随访时间、性别、种族和手术指征。在线完成了匿名益处问卷(格拉斯哥儿童益处量表(GCBI)和家长对儿童听力表现的评估(PEACH))以及关于设备使用的问卷。记录的并发症包括软组织反应、植入体丢失/取出、基台更换/取出。我们还评估了患者体重、种族或社会经济地位是否为这些并发症的危险因素。

结果

从数据库中确定了24名5岁以下儿童(26耳/26个植入体)并纳入研究。男女比例为14:10。尽管BAHA(®)使用存在挫折和并发症,但患者护理人员报告了主观益处和生活质量(QOL)的改善。10/24(42%)的儿童因严重的植入体周围皮肤反应需要治疗,而25%的儿童需要更换基台和/或植入体。社会经济贫困背景以及新西兰毛利人和太平洋岛民种族的患者发生重大并发症的风险增加,但体重百分位数增加的患者未出现这种情况。

结论

BAHA(®)植入体和助听器系统对5岁以下儿童有价值。由于在听力和生活质量方面的明显益处,家长能够容忍皮肤反应和并发症。鉴于此,有必要对潜在的BAHA(®)植入候选幼儿的家长进行仔细的咨询。

相似文献

1
Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age.5岁以下儿童骨锚式助听器植入经验。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.033. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
2
The use of a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha) in children with severe behavioural problems--the Birmingham Baha programme experience.骨锚式助听器(Baha)在有严重行为问题儿童中的应用——伯明翰Baha项目经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jun;74(6):608-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
3
The role of bone anchored hearing aids in children with Down syndrome.骨锚式助听器在唐氏综合征儿童中的作用。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jun;72(6):751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.01.035. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
4
Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit.骨锚式助听器植入相关皮肤并发症的回顾性分析:与手术技术、生活质量及听力获益的关联
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May-Jun;84(3):324-331. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha attract in four pediatric patients.四名儿科患者将传统骨结合式骨锚式助听器转换为巴哈吸引式助听器。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;91:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.骨锚式助听器:生活质量评估。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Apr;130(4):394-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.4.394.
7
Benefit and quality of life after bone-anchored hearing aid fitting in children with unilateral or bilateral hearing impairment.单侧或双侧听力障碍儿童佩戴骨锚式助听器后的益处及生活质量
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Feb;137(2):130-8. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.252.
8
Bilateral Bone-anchored Hearing Aid: impact on quality of life measured with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.双侧骨锚式助听器:使用格拉斯哥受益量表评估对生活质量的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):891-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4ec6f.
9
Complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients.儿童患者骨锚式助听器的并发症
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;75(6):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.018. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
10
Intermediate outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device in a paediatric population.经皮骨传导听力装置在儿科人群中的中期结果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;94:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of ear and hearing health research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a focus on equity.新西兰奥塔哥地区耳与听力健康研究的范围综述:聚焦公平性
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Jan 15;55(3):611-632. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2435394. eCollection 2025.
2
Bone Conduction Amplification in Children: Stimulation via a Percutaneous Abutment versus a Transcutaneous Softband.儿童骨导助听器:经皮植入体与经皮软带刺激的比较。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1307-1315. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000710.
3
Response to: Comment on "Original Solution for Middle Ear Implant and Anesthetic/Surgical Management in a Child with Severe Craniofacial Dysmorphism".
对《关于严重颅面畸形患儿中耳植入及麻醉/手术管理的原始解决方案》评论的回应
Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2016;2016:8354034. doi: 10.1155/2016/8354034. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
4
Vibrant Soundbridge in preschool children with unilateral aural atresia: acceptance and benefit.针对单侧外耳道闭锁学龄前儿童的振动声桥:接受度与益处
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4265-1. Epub 2016 Aug 25.