Cheng Judy W M, Colucci Vincent, Howard Patricia A, Nappi Jean M, Spinler Sarah A
MCPHS University, Boston, MA, USA Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA Providence/St Patrick Hospital and Health Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 May;49(5):599-606. doi: 10.1177/1060028015571410. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vorapaxar, a protease activator receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist, in the management of atherosclerotic diseases.
Peer-reviewed clinical trials and review articles were identified from MEDLINE and Current Content database (both 1966 to December 31, 2014) using the search terms vorapaxar and protease activator receptor antagonist.
A total of 30 clinical studies were identified (16 clinical trials, including subanalyses, 14 related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and drug interactions).
Two phase III clinical trials with vorapaxar have been published. In patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), vorapaxar failed to significantly reduce the primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia with hospitalization, and urgent coronary revascularization). Conversely, in a study of secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease, the composite end point of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke was significantly reduced. In both trials, the safety end points of major/minor bleeding were increased compared with placebo. In the secondary prevention trial, an increased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage led to the exclusion of patients with a prior history of stroke.
Vorapaxar is approved for use with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in stable patients with peripheral arterial disease or a history of MI. However, the addition of vorapaxar to other antiplatelets can significantly increase the risk of bleeding. It is, therefore, essential to balance the need for further reduction of risk of thrombotic event with patient's individual bleeding risk.
综述蛋白酶激活受体-1(PAR-1)拮抗剂沃拉帕沙在动脉粥样硬化疾病管理中的药理学、疗效及安全性。
使用搜索词“沃拉帕沙”和“蛋白酶激活受体拮抗剂”,从MEDLINE和《现刊目次》数据库(均为1966年至2014年12月31日)中检索同行评审的临床试验和综述文章。
共识别出30项临床研究(16项临床试验,包括亚组分析,14项与药理学、药代动力学、药效学及药物相互作用相关)。
已发表两项使用沃拉帕沙的III期临床试验。在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(MI)患者中,沃拉帕沙未能显著降低主要疗效终点(心血管死亡、MI、卒中、因住院的复发性缺血及紧急冠状动脉血运重建的复合终点)。相反,在一项心血管疾病患者二级预防研究中,心血管死亡、MI或卒中的复合终点显著降低。在两项试验中,与安慰剂相比,主要/轻微出血的安全性终点均增加。在二级预防试验中,颅内出血发生率增加导致有卒中病史的患者被排除。
沃拉帕沙被批准与阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷联合用于外周动脉疾病稳定患者或有MI病史患者的心血管事件二级预防。然而,在其他抗血小板药物中添加沃拉帕沙可显著增加出血风险。因此,必须平衡进一步降低血栓形成事件风险的需求与患者个体出血风险。