Suppr超能文献

从全腺体到半腺体再到超局部高剂量率前列腺近距离治疗:剂量学分析。

From whole gland to hemigland to ultra-focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: A dosimetric analysis.

作者信息

Banerjee Robyn, Park Sang-June, Anderson Erik, Demanes D Jeffrey, Wang Jason, Kamrava Mitchell

机构信息

Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Brachytherapy. 2015 May-Jun;14(3):366-72. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the magnitude of dosimetric reductions of a focal and ultra-focal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy treatment strategy relative to standard whole gland (WG) treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

HDR brachytherapy plans for five patients treated with WG HDR monotherapy were optimized to assess different treatment strategies. Plans were generated to treat the hemigland (HG), one-third gland (1/3G), and one-sixth gland (1/6G), as well as to assess treating the WG with a boost to one of those sub-volumes (WG + HG, WG + 1/3G, WG + 1/6G). Dosimetric parameters analyzed included Target D90%, V100%, V150%, Bladder (B), Rectal (R), Urethral (U) D0.1, 1 and 2cc, Urethral V75%, and the V50% to the contralateral HG. Two-tailed t tests were used for comparison of means, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Target objectives (D90 > 100% and V100 > 97%) were met in all cases. Significant organs at risk dose reductions were achieved for all approaches compared with WG plans. 1/6G vs WG plans resulted in the greatest reduction in dose with a mean bladder D2cc 24.7 vs 64.8%, rectal D2cc 32.8 vs 65.3%, urethral D1cc 52.1 vs 103.8%, and V75 14.5 vs 75% (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Significant dose reductions to organs at risk can be achieved using HDR focal brachytherapy. The magnitude of the reductions achievable with treating progressively smaller sub-volumes suggests the potential to reduce morbidity, but the clinical impact on morbidity and tumor control remain to be investigated.

摘要

目的

评估聚焦和超聚焦高剂量率(HDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗策略相对于标准全腺(WG)治疗的剂量学降低幅度。

方法和材料

对5例接受WG HDR单一疗法治疗的患者的HDR近距离放射治疗计划进行优化,以评估不同的治疗策略。生成了治疗半腺(HG)、三分之一腺(1/3G)和六分之一腺(1/6G)的计划,以及评估对这些子体积之一进行加量治疗WG(WG + HG、WG + 1/3G、WG + 1/6G)的计划。分析的剂量学参数包括靶区D90%、V100%、V150%、膀胱(B)、直肠(R)、尿道(U)的D0.1、1和2cc、尿道V75%以及对侧HG的V50%。采用双尾t检验比较均值,p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

所有病例均达到靶区目标(D90 > 100%且V100 > 97%)。与WG计划相比,所有方法均实现了显著的危及器官剂量降低。1/6G与WG计划相比,剂量降低幅度最大,平均膀胱D2cc为24.7%对64.8%,直肠D2cc为32.8%对65.3%,尿道D1cc为52.1%对103.8%,V75为14.5%对75%(所有比较p < 0.05)。

结论

使用HDR聚焦近距离放射治疗可显著降低危及器官的剂量。治疗逐渐缩小的子体积可实现的剂量降低幅度表明有可能降低发病率,但对发病率和肿瘤控制的临床影响仍有待研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验