Waller Göran, Janlert Urban, Norberg Margareta, Lundqvist Robert, Forssén Annika
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Family Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 13;5(2):e006589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006589.
To investigate the relationship between self-rated health, adjusted for standard risk factors, and myocardial infarction.
Population-based prospective cohort study.
Enrolment took place between 1990 and 2004 in Västerbotten County, Sweden
Every year, persons in the total population, aged 40, 50 or 60 were invited. Participation rate was 60%. The cohort consisted of 75 386 men and women. After exclusion for stroke or myocardial infarction before, or within 12 months after enrolment or death within 12 months after enrolment, 72 530 persons remained for analysis. Mean follow-up time was 13.2 years.
Cox regression analysis was used to estimate HRs for the end point of first non-fatal or fatal myocardial infarction. HR were adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, body mass index, education, physical activity and self-rated health in the categories very good; pretty good; somewhat good; pretty poor or poor.
In the cohort, 2062 persons were diagnosed with fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Poor self-rated health adjusted for sex and age was associated with the outcome with HR 2.03 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.84). All categories of self-rated health worse than very good were statistically significant and showed a dose-response relationship. In a multivariable analysis with standard risk factors (not including physical activity and education) HR was attenuated to 1.61 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.31) for poor self-rated health. All categories of self-rated health remained statistically significant. We found no interaction between self-rated health and standard risk factors except for poor self-rated health and diabetes.
This study supports the use of self-rated health as a standard risk factor among others for myocardial infarction. It remains to demonstrate whether self-rated health adds predictive value for myocardial infarction in combined algorithms with standard risk factors.
研究校正标准风险因素后的自评健康状况与心肌梗死之间的关系。
基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
1990年至2004年期间在瑞典韦斯特博滕郡进行登记。
每年邀请40岁、50岁或60岁的总人口中的人员。参与率为60%。该队列由75386名男性和女性组成。在排除入组前或入组后12个月内发生的中风或心肌梗死或入组后12个月内死亡的情况后,剩余72530人进行分析。平均随访时间为13.2年。
采用Cox回归分析估计首次非致命性或致命性心肌梗死终点的风险比(HR)。HR针对年龄、性别、收缩压、总胆固醇、吸烟、糖尿病、体重指数、教育程度、身体活动以及自评健康状况进行了校正,自评健康状况分为非常好、较好、一般、较差或差几类。
在该队列中,2062人被诊断为致命性或非致命性心肌梗死。校正性别和年龄后的自评健康状况较差与该结果相关,HR为2.03(95%置信区间为1.45至2.84)。所有自评健康状况比非常好差的类别均具有统计学意义,并呈现剂量反应关系。在纳入标准风险因素(不包括身体活动和教育程度)的多变量分析中,自评健康状况较差的HR降至1.61(95%置信区间为1.13至2.31)。所有自评健康状况类别仍具有统计学意义。除自评健康状况较差与糖尿病之间外,我们未发现自评健康状况与标准风险因素之间存在相互作用。
本研究支持将自评健康状况作为心肌梗死的标准风险因素之一。自评健康状况在与标准风险因素的联合算法中是否能为心肌梗死增加预测价值仍有待证实。