Suppr超能文献

按对冠心病的重要性对心理社会和传统危险因素进行排名:哥本哈根城市心脏研究。

Ranking of psychosocial and traditional risk factors by importance for coronary heart disease: the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

机构信息

The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Copenhagen DK-2000, Denmark

The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Copenhagen DK-2000, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 7;36(22):1385-93. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv027. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

AIMS

To rank psychosocial and traditional risk factors by importance for coronary heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Copenhagen City Heart Study is a prospective cardiovascular population study randomly selected in 1976. The third examination was carried out from 1991 to 1994, and 8882 men and women free of cardiovascular diseases were included in this study. Events were assessed until April 2013. Forward selection, population attributable fraction, and gradient boosting machine were used for determining ranks. The importance of vital exhaustion for risk prediction was investigated by C-statistics and net reclassification improvement. During the follow-up, 1731 non-fatal and fatal coronary events were registered. In men, the highest ranking risk factors for coronary heart disease were vital exhaustion [high vs. low; hazard ratio (HR) 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.70-3.26; P < 0.001] and systolic blood pressure (≥160 mmHg or blood pressure medication vs. <120 mmHg; HR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.48-2.88; P < 0.001). In women, smoking was of highest importance (≥15 g tobacco/day vs. never smoker; HR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.43-2.11; P < 0.001), followed by vital exhaustion (high vs. low; HR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.61-2.68; P < 0.001). Vital exhaustion ranked first in women and fourth in men by population attributable fraction of 27.7% (95% CI, 18.6-36.7%; P < 0.001) and 21.1% (95% CI, 13.0-29.2%; P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, vital exhaustion significantly improved risk prediction.

CONCLUSION

Vital exhaustion was one of the most important risk factors for coronary heart disease, our findings emphasize the importance of including psychosocial factors in risk prediction scores.

摘要

目的

按重要性对冠心病的社会心理和传统危险因素进行排序。

方法和结果

哥本哈根城市心脏研究是一项前瞻性心血管人群研究,于 1976 年随机选择。第三次检查于 1991 年至 1994 年进行,共有 8882 名无心血管疾病的男女参加了这项研究。事件评估截至 2013 年 4 月。正向选择、人群归因分数和梯度提升机用于确定排名。通过 C 统计量和净重新分类改善来研究生命衰竭对风险预测的重要性。在随访期间,记录了 1731 例非致命性和致命性冠心病事件。在男性中,冠心病的最高风险因素是生命衰竭(高 vs. 低;危险比 [HR] 2.36;95%置信区间 [CI],1.70-3.26;P < 0.001)和收缩压(≥160mmHg 或服用降压药 vs. <120mmHg;HR 2.07;95%CI,1.48-2.88;P < 0.001)。在女性中,吸烟的重要性最高(≥15g 烟草/天 vs. 从不吸烟者;HR 1.74;95%CI,1.43-2.11;P < 0.001),其次是生命衰竭(高 vs. 低;HR 2.07;95%CI,1.61-2.68;P < 0.001)。生命衰竭在女性中的排名第一,在男性中的排名第四,归因分数分别为 27.7%(95%CI,18.6-36.7%;P < 0.001)和 21.1%(95%CI,13.0-29.2%;P < 0.001)。最后,生命衰竭显著提高了风险预测。

结论

生命衰竭是冠心病的最重要危险因素之一,我们的研究结果强调了将社会心理因素纳入风险预测评分的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验