• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用黑腹果蝇体细胞突变和重组试验分析氯胺酮和罗库溴铵的遗传毒性活性。

Analysis of genotoxic activity of ketamine and rocuronium bromide using the somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey.

Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;39(2):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.etap.2014.12.010
PMID:25682000
Abstract

The present study evaluated the mutagenic and recombinogenic effects of two commonly used anesthetic agents, ketamine and rocuronium bromide, in medicine using the wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in Drosophila. The standard (ST) cross and the high-bioactivation (HB) cross with high sensitivity to procarcinogens and promutagens were used. The SMART test is based on the loss of heterozygosity, which occurs via various mechanisms, such as chromosome loss and deletion, half-translocation, mitotic recombination, mutation, and non-disjunction. Genetic alterations occurring in the somatic cells of the wing's imaginal discs result in mutant clones in the wing blade. Three-day-old trans-heterozygous larvae with two recessive markers, multiple wing hairs (mwh) and flare (flr(3)), were treated with ketamine and rocuronium bromide. Analysis of the ST cross indicated that ketamine exhibited genotoxicity activity and that this activity was particularly dependent on homologous mitotic recombination at concentrations of 250 μg/ml and above. Rocuronium bromide did not exert mutagenic and/or recombinogenic effects. In the HB cross, ketamine at a concentration of 1000 μg/ml and rocuronium bromide at all concentrations, with the exception of 250 μg/ml (inconclusive), exerted genotoxic effects, which could also be associated with the increase in mitotic recombination.

摘要

本研究使用果蝇的翅体突变和重组测试(SMART)评估了两种常用麻醉剂,氯胺酮和罗库溴铵,在医学上的诱变和重组效应。使用标准(ST)交叉和高生物活化(HB)交叉,对前致癌物和促突变剂具有高灵敏度。SMART 测试基于杂合性丢失,其通过各种机制发生,例如染色体丢失和缺失、半易位、有丝分裂重组、突变和不分离。在翅的胚盘体细胞中发生的遗传改变导致翅片中出现突变克隆。用氯胺酮和罗库溴铵处理具有两个隐性标记(多毛 mwh 和 flare flr(3))的三天大的异合子幼虫。ST 交叉分析表明,氯胺酮具有遗传毒性活性,这种活性特别依赖于同源有丝分裂重组,在 250μg/ml 及以上浓度下。罗库溴铵没有表现出诱变和/或重组效应。在 HB 交叉中,氯胺酮在 1000μg/ml 的浓度下,以及除了 250μg/ml(不确定)的所有浓度下的罗库溴铵,都表现出遗传毒性作用,这也可能与有丝分裂重组的增加有关。

相似文献

1
Analysis of genotoxic activity of ketamine and rocuronium bromide using the somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.应用黑腹果蝇体细胞突变和重组试验分析氯胺酮和罗库溴铵的遗传毒性活性。
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;39(2):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
2
Evaluation of the genotoxicity of four herbicides in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster using two different strains.使用两种不同品系的黑腹果蝇进行翅斑试验,评估四种除草剂的遗传毒性。
Mutat Res. 2004 Jan 10;557(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.09.010.
3
Detection of transfluthrin and metofluthrin genotoxicity in the ST cross of the Drosophila Wing Spot Test.在果蝇翅斑试验的 ST 杂交中检测四氟苯菊酯和甲醚菊酯的遗传毒性。
Chemosphere. 2013 Sep;93(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.072. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Genotoxic evaluation of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors by use of the somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.利用黑腹果蝇中的体突变和重组试验对选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的遗传毒性评估。
Mutat Res. 2012 Oct 9;748(1-2):17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
Recombinagenic activity of four compounds in the standard and high bioactivation crosses of Drosophila melanogaster in the wing spot test.在果蝇翅斑试验的标准和高生物活化杂交中四种化合物的重组活性。
Mutagenesis. 2001 Sep;16(5):385-94. doi: 10.1093/mutage/16.5.385.
6
Genotoxicity testing of five herbicides in the Drosophila wing spot test.五种除草剂在果蝇翅斑试验中的遗传毒性测试。
Mutat Res. 2000 Feb 16;465(1-2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00214-4.
7
Analysis of the in vivo nitrosation capacity of the larvae used in the wing somatic mutation and recombination test of Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇翅体细胞突变和重组试验中所用幼虫体内亚硝化能力的分析。
Mutat Res. 1998 Jan 13;412(1):69-81. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(97)00174-5.
8
The somatic white-ivory eye spot test does not detect the same spectrum of genotoxic events as the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.在黑腹果蝇中,体细胞白象牙眼点试验检测到的基因毒性事件谱与翅体细胞突变和重组试验不同。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;27(3):219-26. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)27:3<219::AID-EM7>3.0.CO;2-9.
9
Analysis of UV-stimulated recombination in the Drosophila SMART assay.果蝇SMART检测中紫外线刺激重组的分析。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2006 Jun;47(5):357-61. doi: 10.1002/em.20215.
10
Genotoxic evaluation of two oral antidiabetic agents in the Drosophila wing spot test.两种口服抗糖尿病药物在果蝇翅斑试验中的遗传毒性评价。
Toxicol Ind Health. 2014 May;30(4):376-83. doi: 10.1177/0748233712456091. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Microdosing ketamine in Drosophila does not block serotonin reuptake, but causes complex behavioral changes mediated by glutamate and serotonin receptors.在果蝇中微剂量使用氯胺酮不会阻断5-羟色胺再摄取,但会引起由谷氨酸和5-羟色胺受体介导的复杂行为变化。
J Neurochem. 2024 Jun;168(6):1097-1112. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16070. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
2
Microdosing ketamine in does not inhibit SERT like SSRIs, but causes behavioral changes mediated by glutamate and serotonin receptors.小剂量氯胺酮不会像选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)那样抑制5-羟色胺转运蛋白(SERT),而是会引起由谷氨酸和血清素受体介导的行为变化。
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 8:2023.11.07.566121. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.07.566121.
3
Human Hazard Assessment Using Wing Spot Test as an Alternative In Vivo Model for Genotoxicity Testing-A Review.
利用翅膀斑点试验作为遗传毒性测试替代体内模型的人类危害评估——综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 14;22(18):9932. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189932.
4
Genotoxic evaluation of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in the Drosophila wing spot test.布比卡因和左旋布比卡因在果蝇翅斑试验中的遗传毒性评估。
Cytotechnology. 2016 Aug;68(4):979-86. doi: 10.1007/s10616-015-9852-2. Epub 2015 Feb 19.