Perkel Jessica K, Bentzley Brandon S, Andrzejewski Matthew E, Martinetti Margaret P
Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Feb;39(2):232-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12632.
Delay discounting (DD) is a measure of impulsivity that quantifies preference for a small reward delivered immediately over a large reward delivered after a delay. It has been hypothesized that impulsivity is an endophenotype associated with increased risk for development of alcohol use disorders (AUDs); however, a causal role of impulsivity is difficult to determine with human studies. We tested this hypothesis by assessing the degree of DD present in alcohol-naïve rats selectively bred for either high- or low-alcohol preference.
A novel adaptation of a within-sessions DD procedure was used to compare impulsivity differences between male alcohol-preferring (P) and nonpreferring (NP) rat lines (n = 6 per line) using a 5% sucrose reward. Animals chose between 2 options: 2-second sipper tube access delivered immediately (small reward) or 8-second access after a variable delay (large reward). Each 50-minute session consisted of 5 blocks of ten 60-second trials. Within each session, the delay to the large reward increased in each block of trials. Delays were gradually increased over 3 sets to attain a final delay set of 3, 8, 15, 18, and 25 seconds.
Prior to starting delays, there were no significant differences between lines in sucrose consumption or percent choice for the large reward, and both lines exhibited a clear preference for the large reward. After delays were initiated, choice for the large reward decreased as the delay to its presentation increased. Although discounting of the large, delayed reward was observed for both lines, the degree of discounting, or "impulsivity," was greater for P rats compared with NP rats.
P rats are more impulsive for sucrose rewards before exposure to alcohol compared with NP rats. Thus, individuals genetically predisposed toward developing AUDs may be more likely to engage in impulsive decision making prior to alcohol exposure.
延迟折扣(DD)是一种冲动性的测量方法,它量化了对立即获得的小奖励相对于延迟后获得的大奖励的偏好。据推测,冲动性是一种内表型,与酒精使用障碍(AUDs)发展风险增加相关;然而,冲动性的因果作用在人类研究中难以确定。我们通过评估在酒精未接触的大鼠中,选择性培育出的高酒精偏好或低酒精偏好大鼠的DD程度,来检验这一假设。
采用一种新颖的会话内DD程序改编版,使用5%蔗糖奖励来比较雄性酒精偏好(P)和非偏好(NP)大鼠品系(每个品系n = 6)之间的冲动性差异。动物在两个选项之间进行选择:立即提供2秒的吸管接触(小奖励)或在可变延迟后提供8秒的接触(大奖励)。每个50分钟的会话由5个包含10次60秒试验的块组成。在每个会话中,大奖励的延迟在每个试验块中增加。延迟在3组中逐渐增加,以达到最终延迟组为3、8、15、18和25秒。
在开始延迟之前,品系之间在蔗糖消耗或大奖励的选择百分比上没有显著差异,并且两个品系都对大奖励表现出明显的偏好。延迟开始后,随着大奖励呈现延迟的增加,对大奖励的选择减少。虽然两个品系都观察到对大的延迟奖励的折扣,但与NP大鼠相比,P大鼠的折扣程度或“冲动性”更大。
与NP大鼠相比,P大鼠在接触酒精之前对蔗糖奖励更冲动。因此,在基因上易患AUDs的个体在接触酒精之前可能更有可能进行冲动决策。