Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France2Inserm, U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France3Inserm Clinical Investigation Centre, Université de Lorraine, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Inserm, U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):989-95. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8012.
Clinical evidence supports the beneficial effects of lowering blood pressure (BP) levels in community-living, robust, hypertensive individuals older than 80 years. However, observational studies in frail elderly patients have shown no or even an inverse relationship between BP and morbidity and mortality.
To assess all-cause mortality in institutionalized individuals older than 80 years according to systolic BP (SBP) levels and number of antihypertensive drugs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This longitudinal study included elderly residents of nursing homes. The interaction between low (<130 mm Hg) SBP and the presence of combination antihypertensive treatment on 2-year all-cause mortality was analyzed. A total of 1127 women and men older than 80 years (mean, 87.6 years; 78.1% women) living in nursing homes in France and Italy were recruited, examined, and monitored for 2 years. Blood pressure was measured with assisted self-measurements in the nursing home during 3 consecutive days (mean, 18 measurements). Patients with an SBP less than 130 mm Hg who were receiving combination antihypertensive treatment were compared with all other participants.
All-cause mortality over a 2-year follow-up period.
A significant interaction was found between low SBP and treatment with 2 or more BP-lowering agents, resulting in a higher risk of mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.36-2.41); adjusted HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34-2.37; both P < .001) in patients with low SBP who were receiving multiple BP medicines compared with the other participants. Three sensitivity analyses confirmed the significant excess of risk: propensity score-matched subsets (unadjusted HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.32-2.93; P < .001; adjusted HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.37-3.06; P < .001), adjustment for cardiovascular comorbidities (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.29-2.32; P < .001), and exclusion of patients without a history of hypertension who were receiving BP-lowering agents (unadjusted HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.33-2.48; P < .001; adjusted HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.28-2.41; P < .001).
The findings of this study raise a cautionary note regarding the safety of using combination antihypertensive therapy in frail elderly patients with low SBP (<130 mm Hg). Dedicated, controlled interventional studies are warranted to assess the corresponding benefit to risk ratio in this growing population.
临床证据支持降低血压(BP)水平对社区生活中的、强健的、80 岁以上高血压个体有益。然而,在体弱的老年患者中进行的观察性研究表明,BP 与发病率和死亡率之间没有关系,甚至呈反比关系。
根据收缩压(SBP)水平和使用的降压药物数量,评估 80 岁以上住院患者的全因死亡率。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项纵向研究,纳入了养老院的老年居民。分析了低(<130mmHg)SBP 与联合降压治疗对 2 年全因死亡率的交互作用。共有 1127 名 80 岁以上的女性和男性(平均年龄 87.6 岁;78.1%为女性)居住在法国和意大利的养老院,在 2 年内接受了检查和监测。在连续 3 天内(平均 18 次测量),通过辅助自我测量在养老院测量血压。将 SBP 低于 130mmHg 且接受联合降压治疗的患者与所有其他参与者进行比较。
2 年随访期间的全因死亡率。
发现 SBP 低和使用 2 种或更多降压药物之间存在显著的交互作用,导致死亡率风险升高(未经调整的危险比[HR],1.81;95%置信区间[CI],1.36-2.41);调整后的 HR,1.78;95% CI,1.34-2.37;均 P<0.001)。与其他参与者相比,SBP 较低且接受多种降压药物治疗的患者风险显著增加。三项敏感性分析证实了风险过高:倾向评分匹配亚组(未经调整的 HR,1.97;95%CI,1.32-2.93;P<0.001;调整后的 HR,2.05;95%CI,1.37-3.06;P<0.001)、调整心血管合并症(HR,1.73;95%CI,1.29-2.32;P<0.001)和排除正在接受降压药物治疗且无高血压病史的患者(未经调整的 HR,1.82;95%CI,1.33-2.48;P<0.001;调整后的 HR,1.76;95%CI,1.28-2.41;P<0.001)。
这项研究的结果提请注意在 SBP 较低(<130mmHg)的体弱老年患者中使用联合降压治疗的安全性。需要专门的、对照的干预性研究来评估在这一不断增长的人群中相应的获益与风险比。